arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 1504.03084math.STstat.TH
收藏

Cox回归的超越一阶渐近性

Beyond first-order asymptotics for Cox regression

Donald A. Pierce, Ruggero Bellio

摘要:

为了超越Cox回归的标准一阶渐近性,我们开发了参数自举和二阶方法。通常,计算超过一阶的$P$值需要比似然函数更多的模型规范。详细规定一个必须认真对待的审查机制是有问题的,而且似乎以审查为条件并不是一个可行的替代办法。我们规避这个问题,采用参考审查模型,匹配的程度和时间观察审查。我们的主要建议是一个参数引导方法,利用这个参考删失模型来模拟实验的重复推理。结果表明,最重要的一阶方法的改进-有关拟合冗余参数-是不敏感的假设删失模型。这是支持我们的建议,参数引导方法的基础上通常的随机删失模型,这是更没有吸引力的实施数值比较。作为我们的主要建议的替代方案,我们提供了一个二阶方法,需要更少的计算工作,同时提供更多的洞察到一阶方法的改进的性质。然而,参数引导方法更透明,因此是我们的主要建议。有迹象表明,一阶偏似然方法在实践中通常是足够的,所以我们不主张常规使用所提出的方法。然而,当明确需要时,看看如何最好地检查一阶近似或改进它们是有用的。

英文摘要:

To go beyond standard first-order asymptotics for Cox regression, we develop parametric bootstrap and second-order methods. In general, computation of $P$-values beyond first order requires more model specification than is required for the likelihood function. It is problematic to specify a censoring mechanism to be taken very seriously in detail, and it appears that conditioning on censoring is not a viable alternative to that. We circumvent this matter by employing a reference censoring model, matching the extent and timing of observed censoring. Our primary proposal is a parametric bootstrap method utilizing this reference censoring model to simulate inferential repetitions of the experiment. It is shown that the most important part of improvement on first-order methods - that pertaining to fitting nuisance parameters - is insensitive to the assumed censoring model. This is supported by numerical comparisons of our proposal to parametric bootstrap methods based on usual random censoring models, which are far more unattractive to implement. As an alternative to our primary proposal, we provide a second-order method requiring less computing effort while providing more insight into the nature of improvement on first-order methods. However, the parametric bootstrap method is more transparent, and hence is our primary proposal. Indications are that first-order partial likelihood methods are usually adequate in practice, so we are not advocating routine use of the proposed methods. It is however useful to see how best to check on first-order approximations, or improve on them, when this is expressly desired.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑