arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 1409.4869astro-ph.SR
收藏

改进的SMFT磁图标定及其与HMI的比较

Improved magnetogram calibration of SMFT and its comparison with the HMI

Xianyong Bai, Yuanyong Deng, Fei Teng, Jiangtao Su, Xinjie Mao, Guoping Wang

摘要:

本文对太阳磁场望远镜(SMFT)的磁像标定方法进行了改进。改进后的定标过程利用Fe_(5324.18)O_2谱线上的6个点对观测到的全Stokes信息进行拟合,并采用Levenberg-Marquardt最小二乘拟合算法对Milne-Eddington大气模式下的解析Stokes廓线进行拟合。与单点线性标定方法相比,由于纵向场$B_l$和横向场$B_t$之间的非线性关系,导致纵向场和横向场的强度相差较大,而在倾角和方位角的情况下,差异较小。我们认为,在$B_l$和$B_t$的标定中,采用六点法处理非线性效应是比较好的。此外,与SDO/HMI相比,SMFT具有更大的杂散光,并且获得更小的磁场强度。对于两个黑子区的矢量磁场,SMFT和HMI的磁场强度、倾角和方位角基本一致,线性拟合斜率分别为0.73/0.7、0.95/1.04和0.99/1.1。在孔隙和安静区域($B_l$ $<$ 600 G)的情况下,纵向磁场强度的拟合斜率分别为0.78和0.87。

英文摘要:

In this paper, we try to improve the magnetogram calibration method of the Solar Magnetic Field Telescope (SMFT). The improved calibration process fits the observed full Stokes information, using six points on the profile of Fe ı 5324.18 Å line, and the analytical Stokes profiles under the Milne-Eddington atmosphere model, adopting the Levenberg-Marquardt least-square fitting algorithm. In Comparison with the linear calibration methods, which employs one point, there is large difference in the strength of longitudinal field $B_l$ and tranverse field $B_t$, caused by the non-linear relationship, but the discrepancy is little in the case of inclination and azimuth. We conclude that it is better to deal with the non-linear effects in the calibration of $B_l$ and $B_t$ using six points. Moreover, in comparison with SDO/HMI, SMFT has larger stray light and acquires less magnetic field strength. For vector magnetic fields in two sunspot regions, the magnetic field strength, inclination and azimuth angles between SMFT and HMI are roughly in agrement, with the linear fitted slope of 0.73/0.7, 0.95/1.04 and 0.99/1.1. In the case of pores and quiet regions ($B_l$ $<$ 600 G), the fitted slopes of the longitudinal magnetic field strength are 0.78 and 0.87 respectively.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑