arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 1407.4331astro-ph.COgr-qchep-ph
收藏

双度量大质量引力中的稳定和不稳定宇宙学模型

Stable and unstable cosmological models in bimetric massive gravity

Frank Könnig, Yashar Akrami, Luca Amendola, Mariele Motta, Adam R. Solomon

摘要:

非线性的、没有虚影的大质量引力有两个张量场;当两者都是动力学的时候,引力子的质量可以导致宇宙加速,这与背景数据一致,即使在没有宇宙学常数的情况下。在这里的问题的稳定性的线性扰动在这个双度量理论进行审查。不稳定性提出了几类模型,并推导出简单的标准大规模双引力的宇宙学稳定性。通过这种方式,我们确定了一个特殊的自加速双引力模型,无限分支双引力(IBB),它具有可行的背景演化和稳定的线性扰动。我们讨论了IBB的修改后的重力参数,它不减少到标准的$Λ$ CDM结果在早期的时间,并计算组合的可能性从测量的增长数据和Ia型超新星。IBB预言了一个目前的物质密度$Ω_{m0}=0.18$和一个状态方程$w(z)=-0.79+0.21z/(1+z)$。结构的生长速率在后期由$f(z)\approxΩ_{m}^{0.47}[1+0.21z/(1+z)]$很好地近似。其他双引力模型的线性不稳定性的影响进行了讨论:不稳定性并不一定排除这些模型,而是提出了有趣的问题,如何提取观测量时,线性微扰理论不成立。

英文摘要:

Nonlinear, ghost-free massive gravity has two tensor fields; when both are dynamical, the mass of the graviton can lead to cosmic acceleration that agrees with background data, even in the absence of a cosmological constant. Here the question of the stability of linear perturbations in this bimetric theory is examined. Instabilities are presented for several classes of models, and simple criteria for the cosmological stability of massive bigravity are derived. In this way, we identify a particular self-accelerating bigravity model, infinite-branch bigravity (IBB), which exhibits both viable background evolution and stable linear perturbations. We discuss the modified gravity parameters for IBB, which do not reduce to the standard $Λ$CDM result at early times, and compute the combined likelihood from measured growth data and type Ia supernovae. IBB predicts a present matter density $Ω_{m0}=0.18$ and an equation of state $w(z)=-0.79+0.21z/(1+z)$. The growth rate of structure is well-approximated at late times by $f(z)\approxΩ_{m}^{0.47}[1+0.21z/(1+z)]$. The implications of the linear instability for other bigravity models are discussed: the instability does not necessarily rule these models out, but rather presents interesting questions about how to extract observables from them when linear perturbation theory does not hold.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑