arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 1107.0353astro-ph.IM
收藏

2000 - 2009年地基大型光学望远镜的纸张生产率

Paper Productivity of Ground-based Large Optical Telescopes from 2000 to 2009

Sang Chul KIM

摘要:

我们提出了一个分析的科学(“referred”)论文生产力的目前最大的(直径>8米)地面光学(红外)望远镜在十年期间,从2000年至2009年。我们收集和分析科学出版物数据的望远镜是两个10米凯克望远镜,四个8.2米甚大望远镜(VLT),两个8.1米双子望远镜,8.2米斯巴鲁望远镜和9.2米霍比-埃伯利望远镜(HET)。我们分析了使用这些望远镜在各种天文学期刊上发表论文的比率。虽然来自这些天文台的论文总数最多的是VLT,其次是Keck,Gemini,Subaru和HET,但望远镜每个组件产生的论文数量最多的是Keck,其次是VLT,Subaru,Gemini和HET。2009年,凯克、VLT、双子座、斯巴鲁和HET天文台的每台望远镜分别发表了135、109、93、107和5篇论文。我们已经表明,凯克,VLT,双子座和斯巴鲁天文台的每台望远镜每年产生2.1 +/- 0.9篇自然和科学论文,这些论文在使用该望远镜产生的所有参考论文中的比例为1.7 +/-0.8%。扩展这种关系,我们建议,这一比例的自然和科学论文的数量在整个参考论文的数量,将产生未来的极大的望远镜(ELTs)将保持类似。通过比较上述望远镜的出版趋势,我们认为(i)在同一地点拥有一台以上的同类望远镜和(ii)增加望远镜可用的仪器数量是最大限度地提高论文生产率的好方法。

英文摘要:

We present an analysis of the scientific ("refereed") paper productivity of the current largest (diameter >8 m) ground-based optical(-infrared) telescopes during the ten year period from 2000 to 2009. The telescopes for which we have gathered and analysed the scientific publication data are the two 10 m Keck telescopes, the four 8.2 m Very Large Telescopes (VLT), the two 8.1 m Gemini telescopes, the 8.2 m Subaru telescope, and the 9.2 m Hobby-Eberly Telescope (HET). We have analysed the rate of papers published in various astronomical journals produced by using these telescopes. While the total numbers of papers from these observatories are largest for the VLT followed by Keck, Gemini, Subaru, and HET, the number of papers produced by each component of the telescopes are largest for Keck followed by VLT, Subaru, Gemini, and HET. In 2009, each telescope of the Keck, VLT, Gemini, Subaru, and HET observatories produced 135, 109, 93, 107, and 5 refereed papers, respectively. We have shown that each telescope of the Keck, VLT, Gemini, and Subaru observatories is producing 2.1 +/- 0.9 Nature and Science papers annually and the rate of these papers among all the refereed papers produced by using that telescope is 1.7 +/- 0.8 %. Extending this relation, we propose that this ratio of the number of Nature and Science papers over the number of whole refereed papers that will be produced by future extremely large telescopes (ELTs) will be remained similar. From the comparison of the publication trends of the above telescopes, we suggest that (i) having more than one telescope of the same kind at the same location and (ii) increasing the number of instruments available at the telescope are good ways to maximize the paper productivity.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑