arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 1104.4609astro-ph.COgr-qc
收藏

具有演化声速的暗能量模型中的扰动

Perturbations in dark energy models with evolving speed of sound

Rizwan Ul Haq Ansari, Sanil Unnikrishnan

摘要:

标量场暗能量的扰动行为及其对冷暗物质(CDM)功率谱的影响被认为是由状态方程(EOS)参数和暗能量的有效声速(ESS)决定的。在本文中,我们调查是否暗能量模型的ESS是历元依赖的大规模CDM功率谱留下任何明显的印记。特别是,我们比较的情况下,ESS随着时间的推移而减少,它增加。CDM功率谱被发现在这些情况下,一般抑制相比,$Λ$ CDM模型。在不同长度尺度上的抑制程度原则上可以反映暗能量ESS的演化性质。然而,我们发现,在暗能量的ESS是不断变化的情况下的CDM功率谱的影响是显着较小的情况下,ESS是恒定的,而EOS参数不断变化。此外,它也表明,不同的演化的ESS的暗能量的EOS参数的CDM功率谱上的一个给定的演变的影响是显着的,只有在中间尺度(周围$k \sim 0.01h/Mpc$)。在比哈勃半径小得多和大得多的尺度上,暗能量的EOS参数的演化决定了CDM功率谱相对于$Λ$ CDM模型的抑制程度。

英文摘要:

The behavior of perturbation in scalar field dark energy and its consequent effect on the cold dark matter (CDM) power spectrum is well understood to be governed by the equation of state (EOS) parameter and the effective speed of sound (ESS) of dark energy. In this paper, we investigate whether dark energy models whose ESS are epoch dependent leaves any distinct imprints on the large scale CDM power spectrum. In particular, we compare the cases where the ESS is decreasing with time with those where it increases. The CDM power spectrum is found to be generically suppressed in these cases as compared to the $Λ$CDM model. The degree of suppression at different length scales can, in principle, reflect the evolving nature of the ESS of dark energy. However, we find that the effect on the CDM power spectrum in cases where the ESS of dark energy is evolving with constant EOS parameter is significantly smaller as compared to the situation where ESS is constant whereas EOS parameter is evolving. Further, it is also shown that the effect of different evolution of ESS for a given evolution of EOS parameter of dark energy on the CDM power spectrum is significant only at the intermediate scales (around $k \sim 0.01h/Mpc$). At scales much smaller and larger than the Hubble radius, it is the evolution of EOS parameter of dark energy which governs the degree of suppression of CDM power spectrum with respect to the $Λ$CDM model.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑