arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 1102.2082cond-mat.supr-concond-mat.str-el
收藏

高温超导:解释

High Temperature Superconductivity: the explanation

A. S. Alexandrov

摘要:

1986年,在Georg Bednorz和Alex Mueller发现第一个高温超导体后不久,已故的Nevill Mott爵士回答了他自己的问题“有解释吗?“[Nature v 327(1987)185]表达了一种观点,即我们在1981年预测的小双极化子的玻色-爱因斯坦凝聚(BEC)可能是一种。几位作者随后设想了实空间紧束缚对的BEC,但采用的是纯电子配对机制,而不是电子-声子相互作用(EPI)。然而,其他一些研究人员批评双极化子(或任何实空间配对)方案与一些角度分辨光电发射光谱(ARPES)不兼容,实验确定了载流子的有效质量和铜酸盐超导序参量的非常规对称性。从那时起,电子-声子相互作用(EPI)是高温超导的关键还是微弱和不重要的争论一直是当代凝聚态物理最具挑战性的问题之一。在这里,我概述了双极化子理论的一些发展,表明高温超导性的真正起源是在强电子-电子相关性与显着的有限范围(Froehlich)EPI的适当组合中发现的,并且该理论与关键实验完全兼容。

英文摘要:

Soon after the discovery of the first high temperature superconductor by Georg Bednorz and Alex Mueller in 1986 the late Sir Nevill Mott answering his own question "Is there an explanation?" [Nature v 327 (1987) 185] expressed a view that the Bose-Einstein condensation (BEC) of small bipolarons, predicted by us in 1981, could be the one. Several authors then contemplated BEC of real space tightly bound pairs, but with a purely electronic mechanism of pairing rather than with the electron-phonon interaction (EPI). However, a number of other researchers criticized the bipolaron (or any real-space pairing) scenario as incompatible with some angle-resolved photoemission spectra (ARPES), with experimentally determined effective masses of carriers and unconventional symmetry of the superconducting order parameter in cuprates. Since then the controversial issue of whether the electron-phonon interaction (EPI) is crucial for high-temperature superconductivity or weak and inessential has been one of the most challenging problems of contemporary condensed matter physics. Here I outline some developments in the bipolaron theory suggesting that the true origin of high-temperature superconductivity is found in a proper combination of strong electron-electron correlations with a significant finite-range (Froehlich) EPI, and that the theory is fully compatible with the key experiments.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑