arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 1010.0965quant-ph
收藏

积分形式主义的必要性

Necessity of integral formalism

Yong Tao

摘要:

为了描述物理现实,场的动力学方程有两种构造方式:微分形式主义和积分形式主义。杨在规范场的情况下首先强调了这一事实的重要性[Phys. Rev. Lett. 33(1974)445],这一事实引起了对Aharonov-Bohm相和磁势的更深入的理解[Phys.Rev.D. 12(1975)3845]。本文指出,这一事实在一般物质的波函数中也成立,从而加深对Berry相的理解。最重要的是,我们将证明一点,即对于物质的一般波函数,在绝热极限下,它的积分形式与微分形式之间存在着本质的区别。正是由于忽略了这一差异,导致了Marzlin和Sanders [Phys. Rev. Lett. 93(2004)160408]。用微分算子和积分算子构造场的动力学方程在物理上没有区别,这一点已被广泛接受。然而,我们的研究表明,薛定谔微分方程(即,波函数的微分形式)将导致Berry相位消失并且薛定谔积分方程(即,波函数的积分形式),在绝热极限下,可以满意地给出Berry相。由此得出结论:描述物理实在有两种方法,即微分形式主义和积分形式主义,但积分形式主义是唯一的完全描述方法。

英文摘要:

To describe the physical reality, there are two ways of constructing the dynamical equation of field, differential formalism and integral formalism. The importance of this fact is firstly emphasized by Yang in case of gauge field [Phys. Rev. Lett. 33 (1974) 445], where the fact has given rise to a deeper understanding for Aharonov-Bohm phase and magnetic monopole [Phys. Rev. D. 12 (1975) 3845]. In this paper we shall point out that such a fact also holds in general wave function of matter, it may give rise to a deeper understanding for Berry phase. Most importantly, we shall prove a point that, for general wave function of matter, in the adiabatic limit, there is an intrinsic difference between its integral formalism and differential formalism. It is neglect of this difference that leads to an inconsistency of quantum adiabatic theorem pointed out by Marzlin and Sanders [Phys. Rev. Lett. 93 (2004) 160408]. It has been widely accepted that there is no physical difference of using differential operator or integral operator to construct the dynamical equation of field. Nevertheless, our study shows that the Schrodinger differential equation (i.e., differential formalism for wave function) shall lead to vanishing Berry phase and that the Schrodinger integral equation (i.e., integral formalism for wave function), in the adiabatic limit, can satisfactorily give the Berry phase. Therefore, we reach a conclusion: There are two ways of describing physical reality, differential formalism and integral formalism; but the integral formalism is a unique way of complete description.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑