Gitik-Koepke模型不满足大基数基数假设的自同构
On automorphisms behind the Gitik -- Koepke model for violation of the Singular Cardinals Hypothesis w/o large cardinals
摘要:
众所周知,"GCH首先在\aleph_ω失败"的假设导致ZFC中的大基数。Gitik和Koepke证明了在ZF中并非如此:即存在L的一般基数保持扩张(或ZFC + GCH的任何论域,其中所有ZF公理成立,选择公理失败,GCH对所有基数\aleph_n成立,但存在从PowerSet(\aleph_ω)到λ的满射,其中λ是L中任何先前选择的大于\aleph_ω的基数,例如\aleph_{ω+17}。换句话说,在这样的扩展中,GCH对所有基数\aleph_n在正确意义上成立,但在Hartogs意义上的\aleph_ω处失败。本文的目的是分析Gitik-Koepke证明中涉及的自同构系统。
英文摘要:
It is known that the assumption that ``GCH first fails at \aleph_ω'' leads to large cardinals in ZFC. Gitik and Koepke have demonstrated that this is not so in ZF: namely there is a generic cardinal-preserving extension of L (or any universe of ZFC + GCH in which all ZF axioms hold, the axiom of choice fails, GCH holds for all cardinals \aleph_n, but there is a surjection from PowerSet(\aleph_ω) onto λ, where λ is any previously chosen cardinal in L greater than \aleph_ω, for instance, \aleph_{ω+17}. In other words, in such an extension GCH holds in proper sense for all cardinals \aleph_n but fails at \aleph_ω in Hartogs' sense. The goal of this note is to analyse the system of automorphisms involved in the Gitik -- Koepke proof.
机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。