arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 1008.2102astro-ph.IMastro-ph.COastro-ph.HE
收藏

星系团X射线探测器的交叉校准:IACHEC研究

Cross-calibrating X-ray detectors with clusters of galaxies: an IACHEC study

J. Nevalainen, L. David, M. Guainazzi

摘要:

我们使用了一个样本的11个附近的放松星系团观测的X射线仪器XMM-牛顿(EPIC)pn和MOS,钱德拉ACIS-S和ACIS-I和BeppoSAX MECS检查交叉校准的能量依赖性和归一化的有效面积,这些仪器截至2009年12月。我们还研究了PN和MOS的Fe XXV/XXVI线比温度测量方法。我们进行了X射线光谱分析的XMM牛顿和钱德拉数据的样本的11个集群。我们从DeGrandi和Molendi(2002年)那里获得了BeppoSAX号卫星的信息。我们比较了不同仪器获得的光谱结果相同的集群,以检查仪器之间可能的系统校准效果。我们没有发现任何显着的系统之间的差异,在2 - 7千电子伏波段使用不同的仪器得出的温度。此外,从韧致辐射连续体得到的EPIC温度与从Fe XXV/XXVI发射线比得到的EPIC温度一致,这意味着上述仪器的硬带有效面积的能量依赖性被精确校准。另一方面,硬带EPIC/ACIS通量不一致5 - 10%(即在6 - 25 sigma水平),这表明在2 - 7 keV带中这些仪器的有效面积的标准化中存在类似水平的不确定性。在软能带(0.5 - 2.0 keV),EPIC和ACIS之间存在较大的交叉校准差异。由于软带数据的统计权重很高,EPIC或ACIS对星系团0.5 - 7.0 keV带温度的测量平均不确定性约为10 - 15%。

英文摘要:

We used a sample of 11 nearby relaxed clusters of galaxies observed with the X-ray instruments XMM-Newton (EPIC) pn and MOS, Chandra ACIS-S and ACIS-I and BeppoSAX MECS to examine the cross-calibration of the energy dependence and normalisation of the effective area of these instruments as of December 2009. We also examined the Fe XXV/XXVI line ratio temperature measurement method for the pn and MOS. We performed X-ray spectral analysis on the XMM-Newton and Chandra data for a sample of 11 clusters. We obtained the information for BeppoSAX from DeGrandi & Molendi (2002). We compared the spectroscopic results obtained with different instruments for the same clusters in order to examine possible systematic calibration effects between the instruments. We did not detect any significant systematic differences between the temperatures derived in the 2-7 keV band using the different instruments. Also, the EPIC temperatures derived from the bremsstrahlung continuum agreed with those obtained from the Fe XXV/XXVI emission line ratio, implying that the energy dependence of the hard band effective area of the above instruments is accurately calibrated. On the other hand, the hard band EPIC/ACIS fluxes disagreed by 5-10% (i.e. at 6-25 sigma level) which indicates a similar level of uncertainty in the normalisations of the effective areas of these instruments in the 2--7 keV band. In the soft energy band (0.5-2.0 keV) there are greater cross-calibration differences between EPIC and ACIS. Due to the high statistical weight of the soft band data, the 0.5-7.0 keV band temperature measurements of clusters of galaxies with EPIC or ACIS are uncertain by ~10-15% on average.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑