评论:引文统计
Comment: Citation Statistics
摘要:
我们讨论了定量评估研究联合委员会的论文“引文统计”[arXiv:0910.3529]。特别是,我们专注于一个必要的功能,“好”的措施,排名科学作者:良好的措施必须能够准确地区分作者。
英文摘要:
We discuss the paper "Citation Statistics" by the Joint Committee on Quantitative Assessment of Research [arXiv:0910.3529]. In particular, we focus on a necessary feature of "good" measures for ranking scientific authors: that good measures must able to accurately distinguish between authors.
机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。