Xiang-Song Chen, Xiao-Fu Lü, Wei-Min Sun, Fan Wang, T. Goldman
We reply to the Comment of X. Ji [arXiv:0810.4913] on our paper [PRL 100:232002 (2008)], concerning angular momentum algebra, locality, Lorentz covariance, and measurability of our gauge-invariant description of the spin and orbital angular momentum of quarks and gluons.
机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来，可能存在错误，请以论文正文为准。
继续探索
This is a Reply to the Comment [arXiv:0807.0699] on our paper [PRL 100:232002 (2008)].
We affirm that the proper momentum defined in [PRL 103:062001 (2009)] does respect exact gauge symmetry and is as measurable as the kinetic momentum. The physical part of the gauge field is also as measurable as the electromagnetic field. The Comment of Ji [arXiv:0910.5022] is due to a misunderstanding of our work, and a typical confusion of our gauge-invariant formalism with the specific Coulomb-gauge calculation.
A reply to arXiv:0809.2310, "Comment on Universal Charge-Radius Relation for Subatomic and Astrophysical Compact Objects" [arXiv:0804.2140,PRL100(2008)151102]
Reply to the comment of Chao, He, and Ma.
A Reply to "Comment on `Finding the $0^{--}$ Glueball' " [arXiv:1702.06634] and comment on `Is the exotic $0^{--}$ glueball a pure gluon state?' [arXiv:1611.08698]
This paper has been withdrawn by the authors. We have discovered an error in the evaluation of the diagram, which invalidates our conclusion.
We reply to the preceding Comment by E. van Beveren et al., arXiv:0811.2589 [hep-ph].
Reply to Comments on ``Asymptotic Estimate of the {\it n}-Loop QCD Contribution to the Total $e^{+}e^{-}$ Annihilation Cross Section''
We reply to misleading claims made in a comment to our work by Birse and McGovern in arXiv:1708.09341.
This is our reply to comment (hep-ph/0206289) on our paper [Phys. Rev. Lett. 89 (2002) 011601].
Reply to the comment by L. Kofman, A. Linde and A.A. Starobinsky (hep-ph/9608341) to our article ``Analytic and Numerical Study of Preheating Dynamics'' (hep-ph/9608205).
In this short note we summarize the main results of our paper [hep-ph/0510055] and reply to a recent comment [hep-ph/0511174] on that paper.
This paper has been withdrawn by the author since the comments have been withdrawn.
In this Reply we argue that the conclusions derived in Ref. arXiv:1301.1241 are questionable.
The authors claim to have found a "proper", "gauge-invariant" definition of a charged-particle's momentum in gauge theory, which is more "superior" than the textbook version. I show that their result arises from a misunderstanding of gauge symmetry by generalizing the Coulomb gauge result indiscriminately and is not physical.
Here we give our reply to the comment by Sibirtsev et al on our paper ``Mass and K-Lambda Coupling of the N*(1535)".
A reply to a Comment by Harris and Jungman (Phys. Rev. Lett. 75 (1995), 588), concerning my work on phase mixing and its implications to the dynamics of ``weak'' first order phase transitions.
Comments are presented on the analyses of $ππ$/$Kπ$ scattering and production processes in relation with the combined fit and Adler zero concerning the hep-ph/0701058v1.
The individual parts of the total angular momentum operator in interacting theories cannot satisfy the canonical angular momentum commutation rule, including those proposed in the above paper. Furthermore, the operators in the new proposal a) are non-local in general gauge, b) do not have proper Lorentz transformation properties, and c) do not have any known physical measurements.
I reply to A. Mitra's comment on my PRL paper "Bare quark matter surfaces of strange stars and $e^+e^-$ emission". I show that his points of criticism are not correct.
We show that the recent claim that the expression 1/2 \int x dx [ H_q (x,0,0) + E_q(x,0,0)], involving the generalized parton distributions H and E, measures the transverse angular momentum of quarks in a transversely polarized nucleon, is incorrect.
The points raised in the Comment are addressed and except for one error, which will be corrected, the conclusion is that all of our findings are accurate.
We reply to P. Forgács, T. Herpay, and P. Kovács (arXiv: 1202.6289).
We address the three points raised by the authors of the above Comment.
扫码添加微信好友，提出您的宝贵建议 👇
💡 备注请填写：网站反馈
发表机构由 AI 从论文文本抽取，如发现错误，欢迎反馈修正建议。