Reply to comment on "Two-photon decay of the sigma meson"
英文摘要：
We reply to the preceding Comment by E. van Beveren et al., arXiv:0811.2589 [hep-ph].
机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来，可能存在错误，请以论文正文为准。
继续探索
相关论文
Reply to Comment on "Chiral suppression of scalar glueball decay"
Reply to the comment of Chao, He, and Ma.
hep-ph
Reply to "Comment on `Finding the $0^{--}$ Glueball'" [arXiv:1702.06634] and comment on `Is the exotic $0^{--}$ glueball a pure gluon state?' [arXiv:1611.08698]
A Reply to "Comment on `Finding the $0^{--}$ Glueball' " [arXiv:1702.06634] and comment on `Is the exotic $0^{--}$ glueball a pure gluon state?' [arXiv:1611.08698]
hep-ph
Reply to ``Reply to comment on A QCD sum rule study of the light scalar mesons"
This paper has been withdrawn by the authors. We have discovered an error in the evaluation of the diagram, which invalidates our conclusion.
hep-ph
Reply to Comments on ``Asymptotic Estimate of the {\it n}-Loop QCD Contribution to the Total $e^{+}e^{-}$ Annihilation Cross Section''
Reply to Comments on ``Asymptotic Estimate of the {\it n}-Loop QCD Contribution to the Total $e^{+}e^{-}$ Annihilation Cross Section''
hep-ph
Reply to Comment [arXiv:1708.09341] by Birse and McGovern on "Nucleon spin-averaged forward virtual Compton tensor at large $Q^2$"
We reply to misleading claims made in a comment to our work by Birse and McGovern in arXiv:1708.09341.
hep-ph
Reply to Comment on ``Electron Mass Operator in a Strong Magnetic Field and Dynamical Chiral Symmetry Breaking''
This is our reply to comment (hep-ph/0206289) on our paper [Phys. Rev. Lett. 89 (2002) 011601].
hep-ph
更多相关论文收起更多论文
Reply to: Comments on ``Analytic and Numerical Study of Preheating Dynamics''
Reply to the comment by L. Kofman, A. Linde and A.A. Starobinsky (hep-ph/9608341) to our article ``Analytic and Numerical Study of Preheating Dynamics'' (hep-ph/9608205).
hep-ph
Reply to Cohen's comment on the rotation--vibration coupling in chiral soliton models
In this short note we summarize the main results of our paper [hep-ph/0510055] and reply to a recent comment [hep-ph/0511174] on that paper.
hep-ph
Reply to comments on "A QCD sum rule study of the light scalar mesons"
This paper has been withdrawn by the author since the comments have been withdrawn.
hep-ph
Reply to "Comment on Strangeness -2 hypertriton"
In this Reply we argue that the conclusions derived in Ref. arXiv:1301.1241 are questionable.
hep-ph
Reply to Comment on "Mass and K-Lambda Coupling of the N*(1535)"
Here we give our reply to the comment by Sibirtsev et al on our paper ``Mass and K-Lambda Coupling of the N*(1535)".
hep-ph
Reply to Comment on ``Dynamics of Weak First Order Phase Transitions''
A reply to a Comment by Harris and Jungman (Phys. Rev. Lett. 75 (1995), 588), concerning my work on phase mixing and its implications to the dynamics of ``weak'' first order phase transitions.
hep-ph
Comments on the "Reply" presented in hep-ph/0701058v1
Comments are presented on the analyses of $ππ$/$Kπ$ scattering and production processes in relation with the combined fit and Adler zero concerning the hep-ph/0701058v1.
hep-ph
Reply to the Comment on "Spin and orbital angular momentum in gauge theories: Nucleon spin structure and multipole radiation revisited" [PRL 100:232002 (2008)]
This is a Reply to the Comment [arXiv:0807.0699] on our paper [PRL 100:232002 (2008)].
hep-ph
Reply to 'Comment on "Relativistic shape invariant potentials"'
The points raised in the Comment are addressed and except for one error, which will be corrected, the conclusion is that all of our findings are accurate.
hep-phhep-th
Reply to Comment [arXiv:0809.2310] on Universal Charge-Radius Relation for Subatomic and Astrophysical Compact Objects [arXiv:0804.2140, PRL100 (2008) 151102]
A reply to arXiv:0809.2310, "Comment on Universal Charge-Radius Relation for Subatomic and Astrophysical Compact Objects" [arXiv:0804.2140,PRL100(2008)151102]
astro-phhep-phnucl-th
Reply to Comment on "Bare quark matter surfaces of strange stars and $e^+e^-$ emission"
I reply to A. Mitra's comment on my PRL paper "Bare quark matter surfaces of strange stars and $e^+e^-$ emission". I show that his points of criticism are not correct.
astro-phhep-phnucl-th
Reply to "Comment on 'Finite size corrections to the radiation reaction force in classical electrodynamics'"
We reply to P. Forgács, T. Herpay, and P. Kovács (arXiv: 1202.6289).
gr-qchep-phhep-th
Reply to "Comment on 'Universality of Quantum Gravity Corrections' "
We address the three points raised by the authors of the above Comment.
gr-qchep-phhep-th
Reply to "The meaning of systematic errors, a comment to "Reply to On the Systematic Errors in the Detection of the Lense-Thirring Effect with a Mars Orbiter", by Lorenzo Iorio'', by G. Felici
In this note we reply to the criticisms by Felici concerning some aspects of the recent frame-dragging test performed by Iorio with the Mars Global Surveyor (MGS) spacecraft in the gravitational field of Mars.
astro-phgr-qchep-ph
