Comment on a recent conjectured solution of the three-dimensional Ising model arXiv:0705.1045

Reply to the Comment, arXiv:0810.3243v1 by B. Geyer, G. L. Klimchitskaya, U. Mohideen, and. V. M. Mostepanenko

It is shown that criticism of my paper arXiv:0801.0656 Phys. Rev. Lett, vol. 101, 163202 (2008) by the authors of Comment arXiv:0810.3243v1 is wrong and that their main arguments are in contradiction with established concepts of statistical physics.

Reply to the Comment [arXiv:0810.3247v1] by G. L. Klimchitskaya et al. on "Application of the Lifshitz theory to poor conductors"

It is shown that the claims expressed in the Comment arXiv:0810.3247v1 against my paper Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 101}, 163603 (2008) [arXiv:0809.3901] are obviously wrong or not essential.

Comment on the paper by Y.Komura and Y.Okabe [arXiv:1011.3321]

We point out that the claim of strong universality in the paper J.Phys. A 44, 015002, arXiv:1011.3321 is incorrect, as it contradicts known rigorous results.

Comment on "Conjectures on exact solution of three-dimensional (3D) simple orthorhombic Ising lattices" [arXiv:0705.1045]

It is shown that a recent article by Z.-D. Zhang [arXiv:0705.1045] is in error and violates well-known theorems.

Response to Comment [arXiv:1407.6854] on Palmer et al., Nature, 510, 385, 2014

We respond to a Comment [arXiv:1407.6854 (2014)] on our recent Nature paper [Nature, 510, 385 (2014)]. We categorically disprove the arguments provided in arXiv:1407.6854 (2014) and thereby further substantiate the evidence we presented in our recent study, demonstrating the existence of a metastable liquid-liquid transition in a molecular model of water. We will make our code publicly available shortly along with proper user documentation that is currently under development.

Comment on Inconsistency of the basic nonadditivity of q-nonextensive statistical mechanics, arXiv:0910.3826v1

In a recent paper, Wang. et al. (2009) claim that Tsallis' nonadditivity of q-nonextensive statistical mechanics (Gell-Mann and Tsallis 2004, Tsallis 2009) is mathematically inconsistent and hence one should carefully review Tsallis' ideas and theory in toto. This present comment is to point out that the conclusions of Wang et al. (2009) were arrived at by misinterpreting two basic items and hence the advice of Wang et al. should be carefully reviewed.

Comment on "Dynamic Scaling of Non-Euclidean Interfaces" [arXiv:0804.1898]

This is the revised version of a Comment on a paper by C. Escudero (Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 116101, 2008; arXiv:0804.1898).

Addendum to the Reply Comment [Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 139602 (2009), arXiv:0811.0518] on ''Dynamic Scaling of Non-Euclidean Interfaces''

This is an addendum to the Reply Comment [Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 139602 (2009), arXiv:0811.0518] to Comment [Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 139601 (2009), arXiv:0810.4791] on Letter [Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 116101 (2008), arXiv:0804.1898].

Comment on: "Fluctuation Theorem for Many-Body Pure Quantum States" and Reply to "arXiv:1712.05172"

We comment on: E. Iyoda, K. Kaneko, and T. Sagawa, "Fluctuation Theorem for Many-Body Pure Quantum States", Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 100601 (2017). We also respond to the reply by the afore mentioned authors: "arXiv:1712.05172". The response at hand concludes our discussion of the subject on the arXiv.

Reply to the revised Comment [PRL 102, 139601; arXiv:0810.4791] on ''Dynamic Scaling of Non-Euclidean Interfaces''

This is the Reply to the revised Comment [Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 139601; arXiv:0810.4791] by Joachim Krug on our paper: C. Escudero, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 116101 (2008); arXiv:0804.1898.

对“吸引性活性布朗粒子中无对齐相互作用的群集行为”的评论 [arXiv:2303.07746]

Comment on "Flocking without Alignment Interactions in Attractive Active Brownian Particles [arXiv:2303.07746]"

本文评论了吸引性活性布朗粒子无需对齐相互作用即可群集的论点，指出其缺乏长程关联和定向运动等群集核心特征。