Jacques H. H. Perk
It is shown that a recent article by Z.-D. Zhang [arXiv:0705.1045] is in error and violates well-known theorems.
机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来，可能存在错误，请以论文正文为准。
继续探索
It is shown that the arguments in the reply of Z.-D. Zhang (arXiv:0812.0194) to the comment arXiv:0811.1802 defending his conjectures in arXiv:0705.1045 are invalid. His conjectures have been thoroughly disproved.
This comment regards a recently published preprint by R.Babbush, J.A.Parkhill, and A.Aspuru-Guzik, arXiv:1306.4332.
We comment on Z. D. Zhang's Response [arXiv:0812.2330] to our recent Comment [arXiv:0811.3876] addressing the conjectured solution of the three-dimensional Ising model reported in [arXiv:0705.1045].
We make a few comments on some misleading statements in the above paper.
We comment on a Letter by Vilar and Rubi [arXiv:0704.0761].
A mistake of the effective interaction between D-dimensional Bose atoms [arXiv:cond-mat/0503523] that was published by Physical Review B in 2006 is corrected.
It is shown that criticism of my paper arXiv:0801.0656 Phys. Rev. Lett, vol. 101, 163202 (2008) by the authors of Comment arXiv:0810.3243v1 is wrong and that their main arguments are in contradiction with established concepts of statistical physics.
It is shown that the claims expressed in the Comment arXiv:0810.3247v1 against my paper Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 101}, 163603 (2008) [arXiv:0809.3901] are obviously wrong or not essential.
We point out that the claim of strong universality in the paper J.Phys. A 44, 015002, arXiv:1011.3321 is incorrect, as it contradicts known rigorous results.
We respond to a Comment [arXiv:1407.6854 (2014)] on our recent Nature paper [Nature, 510, 385 (2014)]. We categorically disprove the arguments provided in arXiv:1407.6854 (2014) and thereby further substantiate the evidence we presented in our recent study, demonstrating the existence of a metastable liquid-liquid transition in a molecular model of water. We will make our code publicly available shortly along with proper user documentation that is currently under development.
The first paper is an invited comment on arXiv:1110.5527 presented at Hypercomplex Seminar 2012 and on sixteen earlier published papers by Zhidong Zhang and Norman H. March. All these works derive from an erroneous solution of the three-dimensional Ising model published in 2007. A self-contained detailed rigorous proof is presented that the final expressions in this work are wrong and that the conjectures on which they are based consequently fail. Further errors and shortcomings in the follow-up works are also pointed out. The second paper is a comment on the response arXiv:1209.3247 by Zhang …
In a recent paper published in the Philosophical Magazine [Z.-D. Zhang, Phil. Mag. 87, 5309-5419 (2007), arXiv:0705.1045], the author advances a conjectured solution for various properties of the three-dimensional Ising model. Here we disprove the conjecture and point out the flaws in the arguments leading to the conjectured expressions.
In a recent paper, Wang. et al. (2009) claim that Tsallis' nonadditivity of q-nonextensive statistical mechanics (Gell-Mann and Tsallis 2004, Tsallis 2009) is mathematically inconsistent and hence one should carefully review Tsallis' ideas and theory in toto. This present comment is to point out that the conclusions of Wang et al. (2009) were arrived at by misinterpreting two basic items and hence the advice of Wang et al. should be carefully reviewed.
This is the revised version of a Comment on a paper by C. Escudero (Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 116101, 2008; arXiv:0804.1898).
We comment on: E. Iyoda, K. Kaneko, and T. Sagawa, "Fluctuation Theorem for Many-Body Pure Quantum States", Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 100601 (2017). We also respond to the reply by the afore mentioned authors: "arXiv:1712.05172". The response at hand concludes our discussion of the subject on the arXiv.
This is an addendum to the Reply Comment [Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 139602 (2009), arXiv:0811.0518] to Comment [Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 139601 (2009), arXiv:0810.4791] on Letter [Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 116101 (2008), arXiv:0804.1898].
This paper is a Response to Professor J.H.H. Perk's recent Comment (arXiv:1209.0731v1). We point out that the singularities of the reduced free energy βf, the free energy per site f and the free energy F of the 3D Ising model differ at β = 0. The rigorous proof presented in the Perk's Comment is only for the analyticity of the reduced free energy βf, which loses its definition at β = 0. Therefore, all of his objections lose the mathematical basis, which are thoroughly disproved. This means that the series expansions cannot serve as a standard for judging the correctness of the exact solution o…
This is the Reply to the revised Comment [Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 139601; arXiv:0810.4791] by Joachim Krug on our paper: C. Escudero, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 116101 (2008); arXiv:0804.1898.
扫码添加微信好友，提出您的宝贵建议 👇
💡 备注请填写：网站反馈
发表机构由 AI 从论文文本抽取，如发现错误，欢迎反馈修正建议。