arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 0811.1637gr-qchep-th
收藏

Horowitz-Maldacena提案能成为防火墙的替代品吗?

Can the Horowitz-Maldacena proposal be an alternative to the firewall?

Dong-han Yeom, Heeseung Zoe

摘要:

最近,有讨论认为黑洞互补性不一致,要求防火墙禁止观测重复信息。有人认为,如果Horowitz-Maldacena提案作为选择原则,那么这可能是防火墙的替代方案。在本文中,我们首先指出Horowitz-Maldacena建议似乎有助于带电黑洞的黑洞互补。然而,如果我们进一步考虑Hayden-Preskill的论证,即黑洞可以在信息保留时间之后充当信息镜,那么我们可以证明Horowitz-Maldaceana方案不能帮助黑洞互补。这可以推广到中性黑洞的情况。因此,在结论中,我们发现,动态黑洞不尊重互补性,即使与Horowitz-Maldacena建议。

英文摘要:

Recently, there have been discussions that black hole complementarity is inconsistent and that the firewall is required to prohibit the observation of duplicated information. It is thought that if the Horowitz-Maldacena proposal works as a selection principle, then this may be an alternative to the firewall. In this paper, we first point out that the Horowitz-Maldacena proposal seems to help black hole complementarity for charged black holes. However, if we consider the Hayden-Preskill argument further, which states that a black hole can function as an information mirror after the information retention time, then we can show that the Horowitz-Maldaceana proposal cannot help black hole complementarity. This can be extended to neutral black hole cases. Therefore, in conclusion, we find that dynamical black holes do not respect complementarity, even with the Horowitz-Maldacena proposal.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑