arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 0809.1003hep-phastro-phgr-qchep-th
收藏

光子和引力子质量极限

Photon and Graviton Mass Limits

Alfred Scharff Goldhaber, Michael Martin Nieto

摘要:

对电磁学和引力的规范公式的偏差加以限制的努力,已经探索了随着时间的推移而急剧增加的长度尺度。历史上,这些研究经历了三个阶段:(1)检验牛顿平方反比定律和库仑平方反比定律的能力;(2)寻找光子或引力子的静止质量的非零值;(3)考虑更多的自由度,允许质量,同时保持显式规范或一般坐标不变性。自从我们上次的评论以来,光子康普顿波长的下限已经提高了四个数量级,达到大约一个天文单位,而目前天文学的快速发展使得进一步的进步成为可能。对于引力,甚至关于引力子静止质量的概念也有激烈的争论。与此同时,天文运动的惊人观测结果并不符合爱因斯坦引力与可见光源。“冷暗物质“(缓慢的、不可见的经典粒子)在大尺度上非常适合。“修正的牛顿动力学”提供了银河系尺度上最好的现象学。如果暗物质,也许是不可见的经典场,在这里也是正确的,那么满足这种现象学是一个必要条件。“暗能量“{ \it}可以用类似引力子质量的效应来解释,相关的康普顿波长与可见宇宙的半径相当。我们在表格中总结了重要的质量限制。

英文摘要:

Efforts to place limits on deviations from canonical formulations of electromagnetism and gravity have probed length scales increasing dramatically over time.Historically, these studies have passed through three stages: (1) Testing the power in the inverse-square laws of Newton and Coulomb, (2) Seeking a nonzero value for the rest mass of photon or graviton, (3) Considering more degrees of freedom, allowing mass while preserving explicit gauge or general-coordinate invariance. Since our previous review the lower limit on the photon Compton wavelength has improved by four orders of magnitude, to about one astronomical unit, and rapid current progress in astronomy makes further advance likely. For gravity there have been vigorous debates about even the concept of graviton rest mass. Meanwhile there are striking observations of astronomical motions that do not fit Einstein gravity with visible sources. "Cold dark matter" (slow, invisible classical particles) fits well at large scales. "Modified Newtonian dynamics" provides the best phenomenology at galactic scales. Satisfying this phenomenology is a requirement if dark matter, perhaps as invisible classical fields, could be correct here too. "Dark energy" {\it might} be explained by a graviton-mass-like effect, with associated Compton wavelength comparable to the radius of the visible universe. We summarize significant mass limits in a table.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑