arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv quant-ph/9810058quant-ph
收藏

Bell定理、量子力学非定域性与原子级联光子

Bell's theorem, quantum mechanical non-locality and atomic cascade photons

M. Ardehali

摘要:

1965年的贝尔定理证明了所有对量子力学的现实解释都必须是非定域的。贝尔定理由两部分组成:第一,导出了一个所有局域实在论都必须满足的相关不等式;第二,证明了量子力学概率在某些情况下违反了这个不等式。在理想实验的情况下,贝尔定理已经被证明。然而,在偏振器和检测器是非理想的真实实验的情况下,该定理尚未被证明,因为证明总是需要一些任意的和{ \em ad hoc}的补充假设。在本文中,我们提出了一个新的和相当弱的补充假设的光子从偏振器出现的合奏,我们表明,爱因斯坦的局部性与这一假设的结合导致的有效性的不等式,违反了一个因素,在实际实验的情况下,高达1.5。此外,目前的补充假设是相当弱的,更一般比Clauser,霍恩,Shimony,霍尔特补充假设。

英文摘要:

Bell's theorem of 1965 is a proof that all realistic interpretations of quantum mechanics must be non-local. Bell's theorem consists of two parts: first a correlation inequality is derived that must be satisfied by all local realistic theories; second it is demonstrated that quantum mechanical probabilities violate this inequality in certain cases. In the case of ideal experiments, Bell's theorem has been proven. However, in the case of real experiments where polarizers and detectors are non-ideal, the theorem has not yet been proven since the proof always requires some arbitrary and {\em ad hoc} supplementary assumptions. In this paper, we state a new and rather weak supplementary assumption for the ensemble of photons that emerge from the polarizers, and we show that the conjunction of Einstein's locality with this assumption leads to validity of an inequality that is violated by a factor as large as 1.5 in the case of real experiments. Moreover, the present supplementary assumption is considerably weaker and more general than Clauser, Horne, Shimony, Holt supplementary assumption.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑