arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv quant-ph/0511141quant-ph
收藏

传统绝热条件下可能失效的微扰分析

Perturbative Analysis of Possible Failures in the Traditional Adiabatic Conditions

T. Vértesi, R. Englman

摘要:

最近,Marzlin和Sanders(2004)证明了绝热近似应用于特定的“逆”时间演化系统时的不一致性。随后,Tong等人(2005)指出,广泛使用的传统绝热条件不足以保证这类系统绝热近似的有效性。在这篇文章中,我们探讨了这些意见的起源,通过微扰的方法,并发现,在一阶近似某些非零项出现在解决方案,从而导致故障的绝热近似(尽管事实上,传统的绝热条件得到满足)。我们认为在这种情况下,Marzlin和Sanders的逆时演化系统的哈密顿量不能用t/T来表示,其中T表示总的演化时间。进一步证明了当传统条件不能正确描述非绝热演化时,Ye等(2005)提出的新的定性绝热条件能很好地描述非绝热演化。

英文摘要:

Recently, Marzlin and Sanders (2004) demonstrated an inconsistency when the adiabatic approximation was applied to specific, "inverse" time-evolving systems. Following that, Tong et al. (2005) showed that the widely used traditional adiabatic conditions are insufficient to guarantee the validity of the adiabatic approximation for this class of systems. In this article we explore the origin of these observations by a perturbative approach and find that in first order approximation certain nonzero terms appear in the solution which gives rise to the breakdown of the adiabatic approximation (despite the fact that the traditional adiabatic conditions are satisfied). We argue that in this case the Hamiltonian of Marzlin and Sanders' inverse time evolving system cannot be written in terms of t/T, where T denotes the total evolution time. It is further demonstrated that the new qualitative adiabatic condition of Ye et al. (2005) performs well in some cases when the traditional conditions fail to describe properly non-adiabatic evolution.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑