arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv quant-ph/0405189quant-phcond-mat.mes-hallnlin.CD
收藏

动力系统量子计算中的经典与量子误差

Classical versus quantum errors in quantum computation of dynamical systems

Davide Rossini, Giuliano Benenti, Giulio Casati

摘要:

我们分析了一个量子算法的稳定性模拟系统的量子动力学与不同的制度,从全局混沌可积性。我们比较,在这些不同的制度,量子运动的保真度的行为时,系统的参数被扰动,或当有酉错误的量子门实现量子算法。第一类误差有经典极限,而第二类误差没有经典极限。它表明,而在第一种情况下(“经典错误”)的保真度的衰减是非常敏感的动力学制度,在第二种情况下(“量子错误”),它几乎是独立的模拟系统的动力学行为。因此,在“经典”扰动下量子运动稳定性研究中发现的丰富多样的行为与自然扰动下量子计算的保真度没有对应关系。特别是,在后一种情况下,它是不可能恢复的半经典制度,其中的保真度衰减率由经典的李雅普诺夫指数。

英文摘要:

We analyze the stability of a quantum algorithm simulating the quantum dynamics of a system with different regimes, ranging from global chaos to integrability. We compare, in these different regimes, the behavior of the fidelity of quantum motion when the system's parameters are perturbed or when there are unitary errors in the quantum gates implementing the quantum algorithm. While the first kind of errors has a classical limit, the second one has no classical analogue. It is shown that, whereas in the first case (``classical errors'') the decay of fidelity is very sensitive to the dynamical regime, in the second case (``quantum errors'') it is almost independent of the dynamical behavior of the simulated system. Therefore, the rich variety of behaviors found in the study of the stability of quantum motion under ``classical'' perturbations has no correspondence in the fidelity of quantum computation under its natural perturbations. In particular, in this latter case it is not possible to recover the semiclassical regime in which the fidelity decays with a rate given by the classical Lyapunov exponent.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑