If for any k the k-th coefficient of a polynomial I(G;x)is equal to the number of stable sets of cardinality k in graph G, then it is called the independence polynomial of G (Gutman and Harary, 1983). A graph G is very well-covered (Favaron, 1982) if it has no isolated vertices, its order equals 2*alpha(G), where alpha(G) is the size of a maximum stable set, and it is well-covered (i.e., all its maximal independent sets are of the same size, Plummer, 1970). For instance, appending a single pendant edge to each vertex of G yields a very well-covered graph, which we denote by G*. Under certain conditions, any well-covered graph equals G* for some G (Finbow, Hartnell and Nowakowski, 1993). The root of the smallest modulus of the independence polynomial of any graph is real (Brown, Dilcher, and Nowakowski, 2000). The location of the roots of the independence polynomial in the complex plane, and the multiplicity of the root of the smallest modulus are investigated in a number of articles. In this paper we establish formulae connecting the coefficients of I(G;x) and I(G*;x), which allow us to show that the number of roots of I(G;x) is equal to the number of roots of I(G*;x) different from -1, which appears as a root of multiplicity alpha(G*)- alpha(G) for I(G*;x). We also prove that the real roots of I(G*;x) are in [-1,-1/(2*alpha(G*)), while for a general graph of order n we show that its roots lie in |z| > 1/(2n-1). Using the properties of the roots of the independence polynomial, we demonstrate that the independence polynomial distinguishes well-covered spiders (well-covered trees with at most one vertex of degree greater than two) among general well-covered trees.
The independence polynomial $i(G,x)$ of a graph $G$ is the generating function of the numbers of independent sets of each size. A graph of order $n$ is very well-covered if every maximal independent set has size $n/2$. Levit and Mandrescu conjectured that the independence polynomial of every very well-covered graph is unimodal (that is, the sequence of coefficients is nondecreasing, then nonincreasing). In this article we show that every graph is embeddable as an induced subgraph of a very well-covered graph whose independence polynomial is unimodal, by considering the location of the roots of…
A graph $G$ is a fractional $(a,b,k)$-critical covered graph if $G-U$ is a fractional $[a,b]$-covered graph for every $U\subseteq V(G)$ with $|U|=k$, which is first defined by Zhou, Xu and Sun (S. Zhou, Y. Xu, Z. Sun, Degree conditions for fractional $(a,b,k)$-critical covered graphs, Information Processing Letters, DOI: 10.1016/j.ipl.2019.105838). Furthermore, they derived a degree condition for a graph to be a fractional $(a,b,k)$-critical covered graph. In this paper, we gain an independence number and connectivity condition for a graph to be a fractional $(a,b,k)$-critical covered graph an…
The number of stable sets of cardinality $k$ in graph $G$ is the $k$-th coefficient of the independence polynomial of $G$ (I. Gutman and F. Harary, 1983). In 1990, Y. O. Hamidoune proved that for any claw-free graph, its independence polynomial is unimodal, i.e., there exists a coefficient $k$ such that the part of the sequence of coefficients from the first to $k$-th is non-decreasing while the second part of coefficients is non-increasing. Y. Alavi, P. J. Malde, A. J. Schwenk and P. Erdös (1987) asked whether for trees (or perhaps forests) the independence polynomial is unimodal. J. I. Brown…
If for any $k$ the $k$-th coefficient of a polynomial I(G;x) is equal to the number of stable sets of cardinality $k$ in graph $G$, then it is called the independence polynomial of $G$ (Gutman and Harary, 1983). J. I. Brown, K. Dilcher and R. J. Nowakowski (2000) conjectured that the independence polynomial of a well-covered graph $G$ (i.e., a graph whose all maximal independent sets are of the same size) is unimodal, that is, there exists an index $k$ such that the part of the sequence of coefficients from the first to $k$-th is non-decreasing while the other part of coefficients is non-incre…
A graph $G$ is well-covered if all its maximal stable sets have the same size, denoted by alpha(G) (M. D. Plummer, 1970). If for any $k$ the $k$-th coefficient of a polynomial I(G;x) is equal to the number of stable sets of cardinality $k$ in graph $G$, then it is called the independence polynomial of $G$ (Gutman and Harary, 1983). J. I. Brown, K. Dilcher and R. J. Nowakowski (2000) conjectured that I(G;x) is unimodal (that is, there exists an index $k$ such that the part of the sequence of coefficients from the first to $k$-th is non-decreasing while the other part of coefficients is non-incr…
The independence polynomial of a graph is the generating polynomial for the number of independent sets of each cardinality and its roots are called independence roots. We investigate here purely imaginary independence roots. We show that there are infinitely many connected graphs with purely imaginary independence roots and that every graph is a subgraph of such a graph. We also classify every rational purely imaginary number that is an independence root.
We study the independence complexes of families of well-covered circulant graphs discovered by Boros-Gurvich-Milanič, Brown-Hoshino, and Moussi. Because these graphs are well-covered, their independence complexes are pure simplicial complexes. We determine when these pure complexes have extra combinatorial (e.g. vertex decomposable, shellable) or topological (e.g. Cohen-Macaulay, Buchsbaum) structure. We also provide a table of all well-covered circulant graphs on 16 or less vertices, and for each such graph, determine if it is vertex decomposable, shellable, Cohen-Macaulay, and/or Buchsbaum. …
The independence polynomial of a graph is the generating polynomial for the number of independent sets of each size and its roots are called independence roots. We bound the maximum modulus, $\mbox{maxmod}(n)$, of an independence root over all graphs on $n$ vertices and the maximum modulus, $\mbox{maxmod}_{T}(n)$, of an independence root over all trees on $n$ vertices in terms of $n$. In particular, we show that $$\frac{\log_3(\mbox{maxmod}(n))}{n}=\frac{1}{3}+o(1)$$ and $$\frac{\log_2(\mbox{maxmod}_{T}(n))}{n}=\frac{1}{2}+o(1).$$
The independence polynomial of a graph $G$ is \[I(G,x)=\sum\limits_{k\ge 0}i_k(G)x^k,\] where $i_k(G)$ denotes the number of independent sets of $G$ of size $k$ (note that $i_0(G)=1$). In this paper we show a new method to prove real-rootedness of the independence polynomials of certain families of trees. In particular we will give a new proof of the real-rootedness of the independence polynomials of centipedes (Zhu's theorem), caterpillars (Wang and Zhu's theorem), and we will prove a conjecture of Galvin and Hilyard about the real-rootedness of the independence polynomial of the so-called Fi…
The independence polynomial of a graph is the generating polynomial for the number of independent sets of each size, and its roots are called {\em independence roots}. We investigate the stability of such polynomials, that is, conditions under which the roots lie in the left half-plane (all of the real roots of independence polynomial are negative and hence lie in this half-plane). We show stability for all independence polynomials of graphs with independence number at most three, but for larger independence number we show that the independence polynomials can have roots arbitrarily far to the…
If for any $k$ the $k$-th coefficient of a polynomial $I(G;x)$ is equal to the number of stable sets of cardinality $k$ in the graph $G$, then it is called the independence polynomial of $G$ (Gutman and Harary, 1983). Alavi, Malde, Schwenk and Erdos (1987) conjectured that $I(G;x)$ is unimodal, whenever $G$ is a forest, while Brown, Dilcher and Nowakowski (2000) conjectured that $I(G;x)$ is unimodal for any well-covered graph G. Michael and Traves (2003) showed that the assertion is false for well-covered graphs with $a(G)$ > 3 ($a(G)$ is the size of a maximum stable set of the graph $G$), whi…
A graph $G$ is well-covered if all maximal independent sets of $G$ have the same cardinality. In 1992 Topp and Volkmann investigated the structure of well-covered graphs that have nontrivial factorizations with respect to some of the standard graph products. In particular, they showed that both factors of a well-covered direct product are also well-covered and proved that the direct product of two complete graphs (respectively, two cycles) is well-covered precisely when they have the same order (respectively, both have order 3 or 4). Furthermore, they proved that the direct product of two well…
The independence polynomial of a graph $G$, denoted $I(G,x)$, is the generating polynomial for the number of independent sets of each size. The roots of $I(G,x)$ are called the \textit{independence roots} of $G$. It is known that for every graph $G$, the independence root of smallest modulus, denoted $ξ(G)$, is real. The relation $\preceq$ on the set of all graphs is defined as follows, $H\preceq G$ if and only if $I(H,x)\ge I(G,x)\text{ for all }x\in [ξ(G),0].$ We find the maximum and minimum connected unicyclic and connected well-covered unicyclic graphs of a given order with respect to $\pr…
If for any $k$ the $k$-th coefficient of a polynomial I(G;x) is equal to the number of stable sets of cardinality $k$ in the graph $G$, then it is called the independence polynomial of $G$ (Gutman and Harary, 1983). Let $a$ be the size of a maximum stable set. Alavi, Malde, Schwenk and Erdos (1987)conjectured that I(T,x) is unimodal for any tree T, while, in general, they proved that for any permutation $p$ of {1,2,...,a} there is a graph such that s_{p(1)}<s_{p(2)}<...<s_{p(a)}. Brown, Dilcher and Nowakowski (2000) conjectured that I(G;x) is unimodal for any well-covered graph. Michael and Tr…
We generalize two main theorems of matching polynomials of undirected simple graphs, namely, real-rootedness and the Heilmann-Lieb root bound. Viewing the matching polynomial of a graph $G$ as the independence polynomial of the line graph of $G$, we determine conditions for the extension of these theorems to the independence polynomial of any graph. In particular, we show that a stability-like property of the multivariate independence polynomial characterizes claw-freeness. Finally, we give and extend multivariate versions of Godsil's theorems on the divisibility of matching polynomials of tre…
A graph $G$ is {\em well-covered} if every maximal independent set has the same cardinality $q$. Let $i_k(G)$ denote the number of independent sets of cardinality $k$ in $G$. Brown, Dilcher, and Nowakowski conjectured that the independence sequence $(i_0(G), i_1(G), \ldots, i_q(G))$ was unimodal for any well-ordered graph $G$ with independence number $q$. Michael and Traves disproved this conjecture. Instead they posited the so-called ``Roller Coaster" Conjecture: that the terms \[ i_{\left\lceil\frac{q}2\right\rceil}(G), i_{\left\lceil\frac{q}2\right\rceil+1}(G), \ldots, i_q(G) \] could be in…
A graph is well-covered if all its maximal independent sets are of the same cardinality (Plummer, 1970). If G is a well-covered graph, has at least two vertices, and G-v is well-covered for every vertex v, then G is a 1-well-covered graph (Staples, 1975). We call G a λ-quasi-regularizable graph if λ |S| =< |N(S)| for every independent set S of G. The independence polynomial I(G;x) is the generating function of independent sets in a graph G (Gutman & Harary, 1983). The Roller-Coaster Conjecture (Michael & Travis, 2003), saying that for every permutation σ of the set {(α/2),...,α} there exists a…
A graph is well-covered if every maximal independent set has the same cardinality, namely the vertex independence number. We answer a question of Topp and Volkmann and prove that if the Cartesian product of two graphs is well-covered, then at least one of them must be well-covered.
The $k$-token graph $T_k(G)$ is the graph whose vertices are the $k$-subsets of vertices of a graph $G$, with two vertices of $T_k(G)$ adjacent if their symmetric difference is an edge of $G$. We explore when $T_k(G)$ is a well-covered graph, that is, when all of its maximal independent sets have the same cardinality. For bipartite graphs $G$, we classify when $T_k(G)$ is well-covered. For an arbitrary graph $G$, we show that if $T_2(G)$ is well-covered, then the girth of $G$ is at most four. We include upper and lower bounds on the independence number of $T_k(G)$, and provide some families of…
In this paper we introduce some Christoffel-Darboux type identities for independence polynomials. As an application, we give a new proof of a theorem of M. Chudnovsky and P. Seymour, claiming that the independence polynomial of a claw-free graph has only real roots. Another application is related to a conjecture of Merrifield and Simmons.
In [1] Peters and Regts confirmed a conjecture by Sokal by showing that for every $Δ\in \mathbb{Z}_{\geq 3}$ there exists a complex neighborhood of the interval $\left[0, \frac{\left(Δ- 1\right)^{Δ- 1}}{\left(Δ-2\right)^Δ}\right)$ on which the independence polynomial is nonzero for all graphs of maximum degree $Δ$. Furthermore, they gave an explicit neighborhood $U_Δ$ containing this interval on which the independence polynomial is nonzero for all finite rooted Cayley trees with branching number $Δ$. The question remained whether $U_Δ$ would be zero-free for the independence polynomial of all …
A conjecture of Sokal (2001) regarding the domain of non-vanishing for independence polynomials of graphs, states that given any natural number $Δ\ge 3$, there exists a neighborhood in $\mathbb C$ of the interval $[0, \frac{(Δ-1)^{Δ-1}}{(Δ-2)^Δ})$ on which the independence polynomial of any graph with maximum degree at most $Δ$ does not vanish. We show here that Sokal's Conjecture holds, as well as a multivariate version, and prove optimality for the domain of non-vanishing. An important step is to translate the setting to the language of complex dynamical systems.
Let G = (V;E) be a simple graph. We consider domination polynomial, matching polynomial and edge cover polynomial of G. Graphs which their polynomials have few roots can give sometimes a very surprising information about the structure of the graph. In this paper we study graphs which their domination polynomial, independence polynomial and edge cover polynomial have few roots.
An independent dominating set of the simple graph $G=(V,E)$ is a vertex subset that is both dominating and independent in $G$. The independent domination polynomial of a graph $G$ is the polynomial $D_i(G,x)=\sum_{A} x^{|A|}$, summed over all independent dominating subsets $A\subseteq V$. A root of $D_i(G,x)$ is called an independence domination root. We investigate the independent domination polynomials of some generalized compound graphs. As consequences, we construct graphs whose independence domination roots are real. Also, we consider some certain graphs and study the number of their inde…
The independence gap of a graph was introduced by Ekim et al. (2018) as a measure of how far a graph is from being well-covered. It is defined as the difference between the maximum and minimum size of a maximal independent set. We investigate the independence gap of a graph from structural and algorithmic points of view, with a focus on classes of perfect graphs. Generalizing results on well-covered graphs due to Dean and Zito (1994) and Hujdurović et al. (2018), we express the independence gap of a perfect graph in terms of clique partitions and use this characterization to develop a polynomi…
Let $G$ be a simple graph of order $n$. An independent set in a graph is a set of pairwise non-adjacent vertices. The independence polynomial of $G$ is the polynomial $I(G,x)=\sum_{k=0}^{n} s(G,k) x^{k}$, where $s(G,k)$ is the number of independent sets of $G$ of size $k$ and $s(G,0)=1$. Clearly all real roots of $I(G,x)$ are negative. Let $ξ(G)$ be the largest real root of $I(G,x)$. Let $H$ be a simple graph. By $G \succeq H$ we mean that $I(H,x)\geq I(G,x)$ for every $x$ in the interval $[ξ(G),0]$. We note that $G\succeq H$ implies that $ξ(G)\geq ξ(H)$. Also we let $G\succ H$ if and only if …
If alpha=alpha(G) is the maximum size of an independent set and s_{k} equals the number of stable sets of cardinality k in graph G, then I(G;x)=s_{0}+s_{1}x+...+s_{alpha}x^{alpha} is the independence polynomial of G. In this paper we prove that: 1. I(T;-1) equels either -1 or 0 or 1 for every tree T; 2. I(G;-1)=0 for every connected well-covered graph G of girth > 5, non-isomorphic to C_{7} or K_{2}; 3. the absolute value of I(G;-1) is not greater than 2^nu(G), for every graph G, where nu(G) is its cyclomatic number.
The $k$-independence number of a graph is the maximum size of a set of vertices at pairwise distance greater than $k$. A graph is called $k$-partially walk-regular if the number of closed walks of a given length $l\le k$, rooted at a vertex $v$, only depends on $l$. In particular, a distance-regular graph is also $k$-partially walk-regular for any $k$. In this note, we introduce a new family of polynomials obtained from the spectrum of a graph. These polynomials, together with the interlacing technique, allow us to give tight spectral bounds on the $k$-independence number of a $k$-partially wa…
Given two graphs $G$ and $H$, assume that $\mathscr{C}=\{C_1,C_2,\ldots, C_q\}$ is a clique cover of $G$ and $U$ is a subset of $V(H)$. We introduce a new graph operation called the clique cover product, denoted by $G^{\mathscr{C}}\star H^U$, as follows: for each clique $C_i\in \mathscr{C}$, add a copy of the graph $H$ and join every vertex of $C_i$ to every vertex of $U$. We prove that the independence polynomial of $G^{\mathscr{C}}\star H^U$ $$I(G^{\mathscr{C}}\star H^U;x)=I^q(H;x)I(G;\frac{xI(H-U;x)}{I(H;x)}),$$ which generalizes some known results on independence polynomials of corona and …
It is known from the work of Shearer (1985) (and also Scott and Sokal (2005)) that the independence polynomial $Z_G(λ)$ of a graph $G$ of maximum degree at most $d+1$ does not vanish provided that $\vertλ\vert \leq \frac{d^d}{(d+1)^{d+1}}$. Significant extensions of this result have recently been given in the case $\Re λ\geq 0$ by Peters and Regts (2019) and Bencs and Csikvári (arxiv:1807.08963). In this paper, our motivation is to further extend these results and find zero free regions when $\Re λ\leq 0$. We begin by giving new geometric criteria for establishing zero-free regions as well as …
We study an algorithm for approximating the multivariate independence polynomial $Z(\mathbf{z})$, with negative and complex arguments, an object that has strong connections to combinatorics and to statistical physics. In particular, the independence polynomial with negative arguments, $Z(-\mathbf{p})$, determines the Shearer region, the maximal region of probabilities to which the Lovasz Local Lemma (LLL) can be extended (Shearer 1985). In statistical physics, complex zeros of the independence polynomial relate to existence of phase transitions. Our main result is a deterministic algorithm to …
The linear complementarity problem is a continuous optimization problem that generalizes convex quadratic programming, Nash equilibria of bimatrix games and several such problems. This paper presents a continuous optimization formulation for the weighted independence number of a graph by characterizing it as the maximum weighted $\ell_1$ norm over the solution set of a linear complementarity problem (LCP). The minimum $\ell_1$ norm of solutions of this LCP is a lower bound on the independent domination number of the graph. Unlike the case of the maximum $\ell_1$ norm, this lower bound is in ge…
A broadcast on a nontrivial connected graph G is a function f from the vertices of G to the non-negative integers such that f(v) does not exceed e(v) (the eccentricity of v) for each vertex v. If G is disconnected, we define a broadcast on G as the union of broadcasts on its components. In a search for the best way to generalise the concept of independent sets in graphs to independent broadcasts, there are several ways to look at an independent set X of a graph G. One way is from the point of view of the vertices in X: no two vertices are adjacent -- the usual definition. Another way is from t…
We reduce the conditionally monotone (c-monotone) independence of Hasebe to tensor independence. For that purpose, we use the approach developed for the reduction of boolean, free and monotone independences to tensor independence. We apply the tensor product realization of c-monotone random variables to introduce the c-comb (loop) product of birooted graphs, a generalization of the comb (loop) product of rooted graphs, and we show that it is related to the c-monotone additive (multiplicative) convolution of distributions.
Planar ternary graphs, flag spheres, and Delannoy polynomials
University of Kansas（堪萨斯大学）；University of Vermont（佛蒙特大学）；Max Planck Institute for Mathematics in the Sciences（马克斯·普朗克科学促进研究所数学系）；Youngstown State University（扬斯敦州立大学）；Georgia Institute of Technology（佐治亚理工学院）
A graph with at most two vertices of the same degree is called antiregular (Merris 2003), maximally nonregular (Zykov 1990) or quasiperfect (Behzad, Chartrand 1967). If s_{k} is the number of independent sets of cardinality k in a graph G, then I(G;x) = s_{0} + s_{1}x + ... + s_{alpha}x^{alpha} is the independence polynomial of G (Gutman, Harary 1983), where alpha = alpha(G) is the size of a maximum independent set. In this paper we derive closed formulae for the independence polynomials of antiregular graphs. In particular, we deduce that every antiregular graph A is uniquely defined by its i…
Fendley, Schoutens and van Eerten [Fendley et al., J. Phys. A: Math. Gen., 38 (2005), pp. 315-322] studied the hard square model at negative activity. They found analytical and numerical evidence that the eigenvalues of the transfer matrix with periodic boundary were all roots of unity. They also conjectured that for an m times n square grid, with doubly periodic boundary, the partition function is equal to 1 when m and n are relatively prime. These conjectures were later proven by Jonsson [Jonsson, Electronic J. Combin., 13(1) (2006), R67]. There, it was also noted that the cylindrical case s…
A graph is said to be well-covered if all its maximal independent sets are of the same size. In 1999, Yamashita and Kameda introduced a subclass of well-covered graphs, called localizable graphs and defined as graphs having a partition of the vertex set into strong cliques, where a clique in a graph is strong if it intersects all maximal independent sets. Yamashita and Kameda observed that all well-covered trees are localizable, pointed out that the converse inclusion fails in general, and asked for a characterization of localizable graphs. In this paper we obtain several structural and algori…
The beautiful Beraha-Kahane-Weiss theorem has found many applications within graph theory, allowing for the determination of the limits of root of graph polynomials in settings as vast as chromatic polynomials, network reliability, and generating polynomials related to independence and domination. Here we extend the class of functions to which the BKW theorem can be applied, and provide some applications in combinatorics.
A Ridge-Saturation Characterization of $α$-Critical $\mathbf {W}_p$ Graphs
Hanoi University of Science and Technology（河内科技大学）；Ariel University（阿里埃勒大学）；Holon Institute of Technology（霍隆理工学院）；Universidad Nacional de San Luis（圣路易斯国立大学）
It has been shown by Voiculescu and Biane that the analytic subordination property holds for free additive and multiplicative convolutions. In this paper, we present an operatorial approach to subordination for free multiplicative convolutions. This study is based on the concepts of `freeness with subordination', or `s-free independence', and `orthogonal independence', introduced recently in the context of free additive convolutions. In particular, we introduce and study the associated multiplicative convolutions and construct related operators, called `subordination operators' and `subordinat…
Realizable (reg, deg h)-Pairs for Cover Ideals via Independence Polynomials
Hobart and William Smith Colleges（霍巴特和威廉史密斯学院）；Chennai Mathematical Institute（金奈数学研究所）；Bryn Mawr College（布林莫尔学院）；Connecticut College（康涅狄格学院）；William & Mary（威廉与玛丽学院）；Colgate University（科尔盖特大学）
Quantized Howe-type dualities via Koornwinder polynomials and the X=K phenomenon
Institut Camille Jordan, Lyon 1 University（里昂第一大学）；Department of Mathematics, University of Pittsburgh（匹兹堡大学）；Institut Denis Poisson, University of Tours（图尔大学）；Department of Mathematics and Statistics, State University of New York at Albany（纽约州立大学奥尔巴尼分校）
