Is the cyclic prefix necessary?
英文摘要：
We show that one can do away with the cyclic prefix (CP) for SC-FDE and OFDM at the cost of a moderate increase in the complexity of a DFT-based receiver. Such an approach effectively deals with the decrease in the number of channel uses due to the introduction of the CP. It is shown that the SINR for SC-FDE remains the same asymptotically with the proposed receiver without CP as that of the conventional receiver with CP. The results are shown for $N_t$ transmit antennas and $N_r$ receive antennas where $N_r \geq N_t$.
机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来，可能存在错误，请以论文正文为准。
