arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2610.17838cs.SD

超越固定目标:自回归文本到语音模型的单样本策略内说话人个性化研究

Beyond Fixed Targets: On-Policy One-Shot Speaker Personalization for Autoregressive Text-To-Speech Models

Seoul National University(首尔大学);University of Seoul(首尔市立大学)

Sangkwon Park, Che Hyun Lee, Heeseung Kim, Sungroh Yoon

AI总结:

该研究针对自回归TTS模型单样本个性化的固定策略外监督问题,提出GRPO与OPSD两种策略内方法,在保持可理解性的同时提升说话人相似度,为单样本AR TTS个性化提供有效框架。

摘要:

自回归(AR)文本到语音(TTS)模型的单样本个性化仍具挑战性,因为对单个参考样本对进行监督微调(SFT)会迅速降低生成质量。我们发现固定的策略外监督是AR TTS单样本SFT失败的关键原因,会导致推理时输出空白或近乎空白。用零样本伪样本对丰富训练数据可消除该失败,但几乎无法提升说话人相似度,还会增加词错误率,因为目标仍固定且采用教师强制机制。因此,我们提出两种单样本说话人个性化的策略内方法:带说话人相似度奖励的分组相对策略优化(GRPO),以及带参考条件教师软监督的策略内自蒸馏(OPSD)。两种策略内方法均在保持可理解性的同时提升了说话人相似度,且各有优劣:GRPO实现了最强的整体性能,而OPSD无需外部奖励评估即可大幅加快适配速度。进一步分析证实,这些提升源于策略内监督而非目标多样性,确立了策略内训练是AR TTS单样本个性化的有效框架。

英文摘要:

One-shot personalization of autoregressive (AR) text-to-speech (TTS) models remains challenging because supervised fine-tuning (SFT) on a single reference pair rapidly degrades generation quality. We identify fixed, off-policy supervision as a key cause of failure in one-shot SFT for AR TTS, leading to blank or near-empty outputs at inference. Diversifying the training data with zero-shot pseudo-pairs eliminates this failure but yields little improvement in speaker similarity and increases word error rate because the targets remain fixed and teacher-forced. We therefore propose two on-policy approaches for one-shot speaker personalization: Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO) with a speaker-similarity reward and On-Policy Self-Distillation (OPSD) with soft supervision from a reference-conditioned teacher. Both on-policy methods improve speaker similarity while preserving intelligibility, with different trade-offs: GRPO achieves the strongest overall performance, whereas OPSD enables substantially faster adaptation without external reward evaluation. Further analysis confirms that these gains stem from on-policy supervision rather than target diversity, establishing on-policy training as an effective framework for one-shot AR TTS personalization.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑