arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2610.13910cs.CL

当视觉语言模型破坏它们所知晓的内容:空间表征低于词汇先验

When VLMs Destroy What They Know: Spatial Representations Fall Below Lexical Priors

Thapar Institute of Engineering and Technology(塔帕尔工程技术学院);Tel Aviv University(特拉维夫大学)

Shubh Garg, Chen Shani

AI总结:

该研究提出EICS指标与CASP-VL基准,发现VLMs的空间关系表征忠实度远低于词汇信息,且该关系在全局表征中消失,揭示了其存在的系统性缺陷。

摘要:

视觉语言模型(VLMs)越来越多地用于分析和推理图像,但目前尚不清楚它们的内部表征是否忠实地编码了此类推理所需的结构化关系。我们引入EICS(Evaluation-Invariant Concept Stability,评估不变概念稳定性),这是一种用于测试表征在受控单概念干预下是否一致编码概念的指标;同时引入CASP-VL(Causally controlled Spatial Perturbations for Vision-Language models,面向视觉语言模型的因果控制空间扰动),这是一个源自Visual Genome场景图的因果控制空间扰动基准。在多个VLM架构上,我们发现空间关系的表征忠实度远低于词汇信息,即便相同模型在组合基准上的得分远高于随机水平。进一步分析表明,该关系在谓词自身的token处可被识别,但当句子通过(EOS)token或平均池化聚合为全局表征时,该关系会消失。这些发现揭示了一种基于输出的评估无法察觉的系统性缺陷:VLMs在下游使用的表征中未保留其输入中存在的关系信息。

英文摘要:

Vision-Language Models (VLMs) increasingly analyze and reason about images, yet it remains unclear whether their internal representations faithfully encode the structured relations required for such reasoning. We introduce EICS (Evaluation-Invariant Concept Stability), a metric for testing whether representations consistently encode concepts under controlled one-concept interventions, and CASP-VL (Causally controlled Spatial Perturbations for Vision-Language models), a benchmark of causally controlled spatial perturbations derived from Visual Genome scene graphs. Across multiple VLM architectures, we find that spatial relations are represented substantially less faithfully than lexical information, even when the same models score well above chance on compositional benchmarks. Further analysis shows that the relation is identifiable at the predicate's own tokens but is lost when the sentence is aggregated into a global representation, whether through the (EOS) token or by mean pooling. These findings reveal a systematic failure invisible to output-based evaluation: VLMs do not preserve, in the representation used downstream, relational information that is present in their own input.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑