arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2607.02467cs.CYcs.AI
收藏

人力资本而非模型基准预测预测中的人机混合智能

Human Capital, Not Model Benchmarks, Predicts Hybrid Intelligence in Forecasting

UCL Global Business School for Health(伦敦大学学院全球健康商学院)

Vivienne Ming

AI总结:

通过真实货币预测市场实验,发现人机协作效果取决于个体的人力资本(如视角转换、知识谦逊和好奇心),而非认知能力或模型基准,表现为三模态分布:多数人依赖或盲从模型,少数人实现互补推理并达到或超越市场准确率。

摘要:

将人与AI配对是否有益通常以单一平均效应报告。使用真实货币预测市场(Polymarket)作为客观、外部解析的基准,本试点研究表明,人机协作的价值取决于一种特定的、可测量的人力资本形式。在个体预测者层面分析,混合性能呈三模态:大多数人要么服从模型(匹配模型),要么利用模型为先前猜测盖章(表现比单独模型更差),而少数人参与真正的互补推理,达到匹配甚至超越(即误差低于)市场本身的准确率。协作特质(视角转换、知识谦逊和好奇心)而非原始认知能力或模型基准,区分了谁达到该模式。结果是初步的但统计上稳健,并推动了一项预注册的复制研究,目前正在准备中。

英文摘要:

Whether pairing people with AI helps or hurts is usually reported as a single average effect. Using a real-money prediction market (Polymarket) as an objective, externally resolved benchmark, this pilot shows that the value of human-AI collaboration depends on a specific, measurable form of human capital. Analyzed at the level of the individual forecaster, hybrid performance is trimodal: most people either deferred to the model (matching it) or used it to rubber-stamp a prior guess (performing worse than the model alone), while a minority engaged in genuine complementary reasoning and reached accuracy matching or even exceeding (i.e., lower error than) the market itself. Collaborative traits (perspective-taking, intellectual humility, and curiosity) rather than raw cognitive ability or model benchmarks, distinguished who reached that mode. The results are preliminary but statistically robust, and motivate a pre-registered replication now in preparation.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑