arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2607.00530cs.ROcs.AI
收藏

从技术指标到用户感知:面向物体检测与抓取的多模态人机交互系统用户研究

From Technical Metrics to User Perception: A User Study of a Multimodal Human-Robot Interaction System for Object Detection and Grasping

Dalian University of Technology(大连理工大学)

Jian Song, Tian Zi, Shen Guanting

AI总结:

通过24名用户的受试内实验,验证了端到端任务成功率从75%提升至90%的技术改进能显著提升用户对速度、可靠性和整体能力的感知,且70.83%的用户偏好改进系统。

摘要:

人机交互系统技术性能的提升并不自动转化为用户在实时交互中可察觉的差异。本文研究端到端任务成功率15个百分点的提升(从多模态基线系统的75%到通过先前消融研究确定的改进配置的90%)是否足以在用户感知中产生一致且可测量的差异。基线系统结合了Whisper进行语音识别、Florence-2进行开放词汇物体检测、LLaMA 3.1进行动作提取,以及区间2型模糊逻辑控制器进行运动执行。改进配置将感知和语言模块分别替换为Grounding DINO + SAM和Qwen 3.5 9B,同时保留相同的控制器。一项包含24名参与者的受试内用户研究在相同的桌面物体抓取任务上比较了两种系统。在与每种配置交互后,参与者使用7点李克特量表对感知速度、可靠性以及整体能力和流畅性进行评分。结果显示,24名参与者中有17名(70.83%)偏好改进系统(精确二项检验,p = 0.043,h = 0.43),并且经过Holm校正后,所有三个感知构念在改进配置上的评分均显著更高,效应量从大到非常大(p < 0.001)。这些发现证实了所识别的技术改进在直接交互中可被用户感知,并强调了在评估机器人操作流程时,用基于用户的证据补充基准测试的重要性。

英文摘要:

Improvements in the technical performance of human--robot interaction (HRI) systems do not automatically translate into differences that human users can detect during live interaction. This paper investigates whether a 15 percentage point gain in end-to-end task success (from 75% in a multimodal baseline system to 90% in an improved configuration identified through a prior ablation study) is sufficient to produce consistent and measurable differences in user perception. The baseline system combines Whisper for speech recognition, Florence-2 for open-vocabulary object detection, LLaMA 3.1 for action extraction, and an interval Type-2 fuzzy logic controller for motion execution. The improved configuration replaces the perception and language modules with Grounding DINO + SAM and Qwen 3.5 9B, respectively, while retaining the same controller. A within-subject user study with 24 participants compared both systems on the same tabletop object-grasping task. After interacting with each configuration, participants rated perceived speed, reliability, and overall competence and fluency on a 7-point Likert scale. Results show that 17 out of 24 participants (70.83%) preferred the improved system (exact binomial test, p = 0.043, h = 0.43), and all three perceptual constructs were rated significantly higher for the improved configuration after Holm correction, with large to very large effect sizes (p < 0.001). These findings confirm that the identified technical improvements are perceptible to users in direct interaction and underscore the importance of complementing benchmark evaluation with user-centred evidence when assessing robotic manipulation pipelines.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑