arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
​通知:联邦节假日调休:哥伦布日 / 原住民日(Columbus Day / Indigenous Peoples' Day),今日(13日)无更新。
arXiv 2606.31037cs.RO

Labimus: 化学实验室中类人灵巧操作的仿真与基准

Labimus: A Simulation and Benchmark for Humanoid Dexterous Manipulation in Chemical Laboratory

University of Science and Technology of China(中国科学技术大学);Beijing Innovation Center of Humanoid Robotics(北京人形机器人创新中心)

Yuhan Wu, Zhao Jin, Tao Li, Yuheng Zhang, Zhichao Wang, Shuo Wang, Jun Jiang, Xiaobo Li, Yanyong Zhang, Jian Tang, Zhengping Che, Yan Xia

AI总结:

提出Labimus,首个针对有机化学实验室中类人灵巧操作的基准,通过真实到仿真建模重建30多个功能资产,定义原子操作和称重流程,揭示任务完成与实验精度之间的差距。

摘要:

实验室自动化通过机器人平台和AI驱动的科学推理取得了显著进展。然而,许多实验室操作(例如固体-固体转移)本质上是动态的,需要实时适应不同的材料和实验条件。这种精度关键的操作难以标准化,促使使用具有灵巧手的类人机器人。尽管存在这一机会,但尚无现有基准评估精度关键实验室环境中的类人操作。我们提出了Labimus,据我们所知,这是首个针对有机化学实验室中类人灵巧操作的基准。Labimus通过真实到仿真建模,从真实有机化学工作站重建了30多个功能保真的资产,共同覆盖了常规有机化学实验的核心操作。该基准集成了铰接式实验室仪器、基于粒子的粉末物理和闭环仪器读数,实现了完整的操作到测量流水线。它进一步定义了六种原子操作和源自真实实验室标准操作程序的七步固体称量工作流。我们引入了一个精度感知的评估协议,旨在联合测量任务完成度、实验精度和长期执行。我们在程序化布局和环境扰动下对三种代表性策略进行了基准测试。结果揭示了精度差距:成功完成实验室任务的策略仍可能无法满足实验协议要求的定量公差。我们的基准暴露了任务完成与实验有效性之间的根本脱节,为开发用于科学实验室的可靠类人机器人提供了新的测试平台。

英文摘要:

Laboratory automation has made remarkable progress through robotic platforms and AI-driven scientific reasoning. However, many laboratory operations (e.g., solid--solid transfer) remain inherently dynamic and require real-time adaptation to different materials and experimental conditions. Such precision-critical manipulations are difficult to standardize, motivating the use of humanoid robots with dexterous hands. Despite this opportunity, no existing benchmark evaluates humanoid manipulation in precision-critical laboratory environments. We present Labimus, to our knowledge, the first benchmark for humanoid dexterous manipulation in organic chemistry laboratories. Labimus reconstructs over 30 functionally faithful assets from real organic chemistry workstations through real-to-sim modeling, collectively covering the core operations of routine organic chemistry experiments. The benchmark integrates articulated laboratory instruments, particle-based powder physics, and closed-loop instrument readouts, enabling a complete manipulation-to-measurement pipeline. It further defines six atomic operations and a seven-step solid-weighing workflow derived from real laboratory standard operating procedures. We introduce a precision-aware evaluation protocol designed to jointly measure task completion, experimental precision, and long-horizon execution. We benchmark three representative policies under procedural layouts and environmental perturbations. Results reveal a precision gap: policies that successfully complete laboratory tasks can still fail to satisfy the quantitative tolerances required by experimental protocols. Our benchmark exposes a fundamental disconnect between task completion and experimental validity, providing a new testbed for developing reliable humanoid robots for scientific laboratories.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑