arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 2606.06950cs.CVcs.AI

何时3D值得?肺CT中CNN和Transformer的资源-性能前沿

When is 3D Worth It? A Resource-Performance Frontier for CNNs and Transformers in Lung CT

Department of Biomedical Informatics University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences(生物医学信息学系,美国阿肯色大学医学科学分校);Department of Information Science University of Arkansas at Little Rock(信息科学系,美国阿肯色大学小岩分校);Department of Neuroscience University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences(神经科学系,美国阿肯色大学医学科学分校)

Md Enamul Hoq, Sharafat Hossain, Imraul Emmaka, Linda Larson-Prior, Lawrence Tarbox, Jonathan Bona, Donald Johann Jr. and Fred Prior

AI总结:

研究在肺CT中2D、2.5D和3D输入对CNN和Transformer的影响,发现2.5D CNN在判别-稳定性权衡上最优,而3D CNN和Transformer存在不稳定性或退化预测。

摘要:

三维模型通常被认为更适合体积医学成像,但其实际价值取决于性能提升是否值得增加的计算成本和复杂性。我们不提出新架构,而是研究在固定训练协议下,输入维度(2D、2.5D、3D)如何影响卷积神经网络(CNN)和视觉Transformer(ViT)的行为。使用无泄漏的NLST队列(n=1,977)和辅助LIDC-IDRI数据,我们发现2.5D CNN在我们的比较中提供了最有利的判别-稳定性权衡(ROC-AUC 0.682,95% CI [0.546, 0.799]),具有稳定的操作点。相比之下,3D CNN表现出阈值不稳定性,而Transformer出现退化预测,例如全正预测。置信区间宽且重叠,因此我们将这些结果呈现为受控的资源-性能前沿和失败模式分类,而非明确的优越性声明。对于类别不平衡的肺癌筛查分类,2D和2.5D输入在性能、稳定性和计算效率之间提供了比全3D表示更可靠的权衡。

英文摘要:

Three-dimensional models are widely assumed preferable for volumetric medical imaging, yet their practical value depends on whether performance gains justify added computational cost and complexity. Rather than proposing a new architecture, we study how input dimensionality (2D, 2.5D, 3D) affects model behavior across convolutional neural networks (CNNs) and Vision Transformers (ViTs) under a fixed training protocol. Using a leakage-free NLST cohort (n = 1,977) with supporting LIDC-IDRI data, we find that the 2.5D CNN offers the most favorable discrimination-stability trade-off in our comparison (ROC-AUC 0.682, 95% CI [0.546, 0.799]) with a stable operating point. In contrast, 3D CNNs show threshold instability, and transformers exhibit degenerate predictions, such as all-positive predictions. Confidence intervals are wide and overlapping, so we present these results as a controlled resource-performance frontier and a failure-mode taxonomy rather than as definitive superiority claims. For class-imbalanced lung cancer screening classification, 2D and 2.5D inputs provide a more reliable trade-off between performance, stability, and computational efficiency than full 3D representations.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑