arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2605.26554cs.LGcs.AI

线性与神经延迟反馈的对抗性赌博机

Linear and Neural Dueling Bandits with Delayed Feedback

The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen(香港中文大学(深圳));The Chinese University of Hong Kong(香港中文大学)

Xiangyi Wang, Pingchen Lu, Jie Mao, Mingze Kong, Zhi Hong, Zhiyong Wang, Zhongxiang Dai

AI总结:

针对随机延迟反馈下的上下文对抗性赌博机问题,提出线性(LDB-DF)和神经(NDB-DF)两种算法,通过将逆概率加权(IPW)机制直接融入损失函数实现无偏校正,并给出线性设置下O(d*sqrt(T))的遗憾界和神经设置下的次线性保证。

摘要:

上下文对抗性赌博机构成了基于偏好的决策制定的基石,在推荐系统和大语言模型对齐中有关键应用。然而,标准算法依赖于即时反馈的理想化假设,这一条件在现实场景(如提示优化)中经常被违反。这种设置带来了独特的理论挑战:与线性赌博机不同,对抗性赌博机估计量缺乏闭式解,使得标准加权技术的朴素适应产生偏差。为解决这一问题,我们形式化了具有随机延迟反馈的上下文对抗性赌博机问题,并提出了两种新颖算法:线性延迟反馈对抗性赌博机(LDB-DF)和神经延迟反馈对抗性赌博机(NDB-DF)。我们方法的核心是一种新颖的估计量,它将逆概率加权(IPW)机制直接集成到损失函数中,确保对延迟或缺失反馈的无偏校正。我们提供了全面的理论分析,为线性设置建立了O(d*sqrt(T))的遗憾界,并为神经设置建立了次线性保证。在模拟和真实数据集上的大量实验证明了我们提出方法的有效性。

英文摘要:

Contextual dueling bandits form a cornerstone of preference-based decision-making, with critical applications in recommender systems and large language model alignment. However, standard algorithms rely on the idealized assumption of immediate feedback, a condition frequently violated in real-world scenarios such as prompt optimization. This setting introduces a unique theoretical challenge: unlike linear bandits, dueling bandit estimators lack closed-form solutions, rendering naive adaptations of standard weighting techniques biased. To address this, we formalize the problem of Contextual Dueling Bandits with Stochastic Delayed Feedback and propose two novel algorithms: Linear (LDB-DF) and Neural (NDB-DF) Dueling Bandits with Delayed Feedback. Central to our approach is a novel estimator that integrates an Inverse Probability Weighting (IPW) mechanism directly into the loss function, ensuring unbiased correction for delayed or missing feedback. We provide comprehensive theoretical analysis, establishing an O(d*sqrt(T)) regret bound for the linear setting and sub-linear guarantees for the neural setting. Extensive experiments on both simulated and real-world datasets demonstrate the effectiveness of our propose.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑