arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
​通知:联邦节假日调休:哥伦布日 / 原住民日(Columbus Day / Indigenous Peoples' Day),今日(13日)无更新。
arXiv 2605.21796cs.CVcs.CL

MM-Conv: 一种多模态数据集和基准,用于上下文感知的3D对话中指代解析

MM-Conv: A Multimodal Dataset and Benchmark for Context-Aware Grounding in 3D Dialogue

KTH Royal Institute of Technology(皇家理工学院)

Anna Deichler, Jim O'Regan, Fethiye Irmak Dogan, Lubos Marcinek, Anna Klezovich, Iolanda Leite, Jonas Beskow

AI总结:

本文提出了一种多模态数据集和基准,用于在动态3D环境中实现上下文感知的指代解析,通过引入包含6.7小时第一人称VR交互的同步语音、动作、注视和3D场景几何数据的基准,以及一个两阶段的指代解析流水线,改进了对话中的指代解析性能。

摘要:

在物理世界中将语言进行定位需要AI系统解释在对话中动态出现的参考。尽管当前的视觉语言模型(VLMs)在静态图像任务上表现出色,但在自发的多轮对话中解决歧义表达方面存在困难。我们通过引入(1)一个用于动态3D环境中的指代交流的基准,该基准基于6.7小时的第一人称VR交互,同步语音、动作、注视和3D场景几何数据,以及(2)一个两阶段的定位流水线,该流水线在视觉定位之前显式解决对话中的歧义,来填补这一空白。该基准包含超过4,200个经过人工验证的指代表达,涵盖完整、部分和代词类型。我们的上下文重写方法在平均上将定位性能提高了11-22个百分点,纯检测器(GroundingDINO)在重写后在代词上达到了56.7%的准确率,几乎是最佳端到端基线的两倍。结果表明,将语言推理与视觉感知解耦比端到端方法在对话定位中更有效。

英文摘要:

Grounding language in the physical world requires AI systems to interpret references that emerge dynamically during conversation. While current vision-language models (VLMs) excel at static image tasks, they struggle to resolve ambiguous expressions in spontaneous, multi-turn dialogue. We address this gap by introducing (1) a benchmark for referential communication in dynamic 3D environments, built from 6.7 hours of egocentric VR interaction with synchronized speech, motion, gaze, and 3D scene geometry, and (2) a two-stage grounding pipeline that explicitly resolves conversational ambiguity before visual localization. The benchmark includes over 4,200 manually verified referring expressions spanning full, partitive, and pronominal types. Our contextual rewriting approach improves grounding performance by 11-22 percentage points on average, with a pure detector (GroundingDINO) reaching 56.7% on pronominals after rewriting, nearly double the best end-to-end baseline. Results demonstrate that decoupling linguistic reasoning from visual perception is more effective than end-to-end approaches for conversational grounding.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑