arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
​通知:联邦节假日调休:哥伦布日 / 原住民日(Columbus Day / Indigenous Peoples' Day),今日(13日)无更新。
arXiv 2309.05162cs.CLcs.AIcs.CV

通过“A Game Of Sorts”收集视觉基础对话

Collecting Visually-Grounded Dialogue with A Game Of Sorts

KTH Royal Institute of Technology(瑞典皇家理工学院)

Bram Willemsen, Dmytro Kalpakchi, Gabriel Skantze

AI总结:

针对先前视觉基础对话研究对指代过程过度简化的问题,提出协作式图像排序游戏“A Game Of Sorts”,通过不受限制的对称对话收集涉及协作指代过程的讨论数据,并公开相关材料。

摘要:

关于(情境)对话中指代表达生成与基础化过程的一种理想化但简化的观点认为,说话者只需适当地指定其表达,以便听话者能成功识别目标指代物。然而,对话中的指代是一个协作过程,不能被恰当地描述为最小化指定的指代表达的交换。先前关于视觉基础对话的研究所做出的假设引发了担忧,这些假设揭示了对对话和指代过程的过度简化观点。我们通过引入协作式图像排序任务来解决这些问题,这是一个我们称之为“A Game Of Sorts”的基础化协议游戏。在我们的游戏中,给定某种排序标准,玩家需要通过基本上不受限制的、角色对称的对话,就如何对一组图像进行排序达成一致。通过强调这种混合主动交互中的论证,我们收集了涉及协作指代过程的讨论。我们描述了使用所提任务进行小规模数据收集实验的结果。所有讨论的材料,包括收集的数据、代码库和应用程序的容器化版本,都是公开可用的。

英文摘要:

An idealized, though simplistic, view of the referring expression production and grounding process in (situated) dialogue assumes that a speaker must merely appropriately specify their expression so that the target referent may be successfully identified by the addressee. However, referring in conversation is a collaborative process that cannot be aptly characterized as an exchange of minimally-specified referring expressions. Concerns have been raised regarding assumptions made by prior work on visually-grounded dialogue that reveal an oversimplified view of conversation and the referential process. We address these concerns by introducing a collaborative image ranking task, a grounded agreement game we call "A Game Of Sorts". In our game, players are tasked with reaching agreement on how to rank a set of images given some sorting criterion through a largely unrestricted, role-symmetric dialogue. By putting emphasis on the argumentation in this mixed-initiative interaction, we collect discussions that involve the collaborative referential process. We describe results of a small-scale data collection experiment with the proposed task. All discussed materials, which includes the collected data, the codebase, and a containerized version of the application, are publicly available.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑