arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 2604.18751cs.LGcs.AIstat.MEstat.ML
收藏

超越系数:非线性时间序列模型中可解释因果发现的预测必要性检验

Beyond Coefficients: Forecast-Necessity Testing for Interpretable Causal Discovery in Nonlinear Time-Series Models

Lucy Family Institute for Data & Society(数据与社会联合研究所);University of Notre Dame(诺特大学);Department of Political Science(政治学系)

Valentina Kuskova, Dmitry Zaytsev, Michael Coppedge

AI总结:

针对非线性时间序列模型中因果分数被误读为回归系数的问题,提出基于边消融和预测比较的预测必要性检验框架,以评估因果关系的实际必要性。

摘要:

非线性机器学习模型越来越多地用于发现时间序列数据中的因果关系,但其输出的解释仍不明确。特别是,正则化神经自回归模型产生的因果分数常被视为回归系数的类比,导致误导性的统计显著性声明。在本文中,我们认为非线性时间序列模型中的因果相关性应通过预测必要性而非系数大小来评估,并提出了一种实用的评估程序。我们提出了一个基于系统边消融和预测比较的可解释评估框架,用于测试候选因果关系是否对准确预测是必要的。以神经加性向量自回归作为案例研究模型,我们将该框架应用于一个关于民主发展的真实世界案例研究,该案例将面板数据(139个国家的民主指标)建模为多元时间序列。我们表明,具有相似因果分数的关系由于冗余、时间持久性和特定制度效应,其预测必要性可能差异巨大。我们的结果展示了预测必要性检验如何支持应用AI系统中更可靠的因果推理,并为在高风险领域解释非线性时间序列模型提供实用指导。

英文摘要:

Nonlinear machine-learning models are increasingly used to discover causal relationships in time-series data, yet the interpretation of their outputs remains poorly understood. In particular, causal scores produced by regularized neural autoregressive models are often treated as analogues of regression coefficients, leading to misleading claims of statistical significance. In this paper, we argue that causal relevance in nonlinear time-series models should be evaluated through forecast necessity rather than coefficient magnitude, and we present a practical evaluation procedure for doing so. We present an interpretable evaluation framework based on systematic edge ablation and forecast comparison, which tests whether a candidate causal relationship is required for accurate prediction. Using Neural Additive Vector Autoregression as a case study model, we apply this framework to a real-world case study of democratic development, modeled as a multivariate time series of panel data - democracy indicators across 139 countries. We show that relationships with similar causal scores can differ dramatically in their predictive necessity due to redundancy, temporal persistence, and regime-specific effects. Our results demonstrate how forecast-necessity testing supports more reliable causal reasoning in applied AI systems and provides practical guidance for interpreting nonlinear time-series models in high-stakes domains.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑