arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2604.06232cs.DLcs.IR
收藏

人文学学者需要什么?数字档案中的推荐系统用户模型

What Do Humanities Scholars Need? A User Model for Recommendation in Digital Archives

Graz University of Technology(格拉茨工业大学);University of Graz(格拉茨大学);Know Center Research GmbH(Know中心研究有限公司)

Florian Atzenhofer-Baumgartner, Dominik Kowald

AI总结:

本文探讨人文学学者在数字档案中信息检索的特殊需求,提出四个维度:情境波动、知识信任、对比检索和连续性,挑战传统推荐系统假设。

摘要:

推荐系统中的用户模型通常假设稳定的偏好、相似性相关性和会话限制的交互。本文研究人文学学者在数字档案中的情况,通过焦点小组和18名研究者的访谈数据,发现学者信息检索存在四个与传统推荐系统用户建模不同的维度:(1)情境波动——偏好随研究任务和领域专业知识变化;(2)知识信任——相关性依赖于可验证的来源;(3)对比性检索——研究者寻找挑战当前方向的项目;(4)连续性——研究跨越长期线而非离散会话。讨论了这些维度对用户建模的影响,并概述了这些维度与协同过滤、基于内容和基于会话的推荐方法的关系。本文提出这些维度作为诊断框架,适用于档案之外的类似应用领域,其中典型用户建模假设可能不成立。

英文摘要:

User models for recommender systems (RecSys) typically assume stable preferences, similarity-based relevance, and session-bounded interactions -- assumptions derived from high-volume consumer contexts. This paper investigates these assumptions for humanities scholars working with digital archives. Following a human-centered design approach, we conducted focus groups and analyzed interview data from 18 researchers. Our analysis identifies four dimensions where scholarly information-seeking diverges from common RecSys user modeling: (1) context volatility -- preferences shift with research tasks and domain expertise; (2) epistemic trust -- relevance depends on verifiable provenance; (3) contrastive seeking -- researchers seek items that challenge their current direction; and (4) strand continuity -- research spans long-term threads rather than discrete sessions. We discuss implications for user modeling and outline how these dimensions relate to collaborative filtering, content-based, and session-based recommendation. We propose these dimensions as a diagnostic framework applicable beyond archives to similar application domains where typical user modeling assumptions may not hold.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑