arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 1702.00860cs.CLcs.CYcs.DLcs.HCcs.IR
收藏

汉典古籍的模式化

Topic Modeling the Hàn diăn Ancient Classics

Indiana University(印第安纳大学)

Colin Allen, Hongliang Luo, Jaimie Murdock, Jianghuai Pu, Xiaohong Wang, Yanjie Zhai, Kun Zhao

摘要:

中国古代文献为有兴趣利用计算方法来帮助发展新的见解和对文化重要材料的解释的人文学者提供了巨大的挑战和机遇。在本文中,我们描述了印第安纳大学和西安交通大学之间的合作,以支持对包含18,000多篇中国古代文献的数字语料库的探索和解释,我们将其称为“汉典”古代经典语料库(Hàn diăn gjí,即“汉典”或“中国经典”)。它包含了中国古代哲学的经典,历史和传记意义的文件,以及文学作品。我们首先描述了这个联合项目的数字人文背景,以及使这个项目可行的人文计算的进步。我们描述了语料库,并介绍了我们的应用概率主题建模这个语料库,注意建模古代中国的文件所带来的特殊挑战。我们给出了一个具体的例子,我们开发的软件可以用来帮助发现和解释的语料库中的主题。我们概述了更先进的形式的计算机辅助解释,也有可能由我们的系统提供的编程接口,以及这些方法的一般含义,理解这些文本中的含义的性质。

英文摘要:

Ancient Chinese texts present an area of enormous challenge and opportunity for humanities scholars interested in exploiting computational methods to assist in the development of new insights and interpretations of culturally significant materials. In this paper we describe a collaborative effort between Indiana University and Xi'an Jiaotong University to support exploration and interpretation of a digital corpus of over 18,000 ancient Chinese documents, which we refer to as the "Handian" ancient classics corpus (Hàn diăn gŭ jí, i.e, the "Han canon" or "Chinese classics"). It contains classics of ancient Chinese philosophy, documents of historical and biographical significance, and literary works. We begin by describing the Digital Humanities context of this joint project, and the advances in humanities computing that made this project feasible. We describe the corpus and introduce our application of probabilistic topic modeling to this corpus, with attention to the particular challenges posed by modeling ancient Chinese documents. We give a specific example of how the software we have developed can be used to aid discovery and interpretation of themes in the corpus. We outline more advanced forms of computer-aided interpretation that are also made possible by the programming interface provided by our system, and the general implications of these methods for understanding the nature of meaning in these texts.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑