通过基督教对人类繁荣的理解评估人工智能
Evaluating Artificial Intelligence Through a Christian Understanding of Human Flourishing
AI总结：
本文提出基督教单轮Flourishing AI基准，评估前沿模型在七个维度上的人类繁荣表现，发现AI默认采用世俗主义，导致道德和神学推理不足。
摘要：
人工智能（AI）对齐本质上是形成问题，而非仅是安全问题。随着大型语言模型（LLMs）越来越多地参与道德 deliberation 和精神 inquiry，它们不仅提供信息，还作为数字神学的工具，积极塑造和秩序人类的理解、决策和道德反思。为了使这种形成性影响可见和可测量，我们引入了Flourishing AI基准：基督教单轮（FAI-C-ST），一个框架，用于评估前沿模型响应于基督教对人类繁荣的理解的七个维度。通过比较20个前沿模型 against 既 pluralistic 和 Christian-specific 标准，我们表明当前AI系统并非世界观中立。相反，它们默认采用程序世俗主义，缺乏必要的根基来维持神学一致性，导致所有繁荣维度的系统性表现下降约17分。最关键的是，在信仰和灵性维度上下降了31分。这些发现表明，价值观对齐的差距不是技术限制，而是由于训练目标优先考虑广泛接受和安全，而非深入、内部一致的道德或神学推理。
英文摘要：
Artificial intelligence (AI) alignment is fundamentally a formation problem, not only a safety problem. As Large Language Models (LLMs) increasingly mediate moral deliberation and spiritual inquiry, they do more than provide information; they function as instruments of digital catechesis, actively shaping and ordering human understanding, decision-making, and moral reflection. To make this formative influence visible and measurable, we introduce the Flourishing AI Benchmark: Christian Single-Turn (FAI-C-ST), a framework designed to evaluate Frontier Model responses against a Christian understanding of human flourishing across seven dimensions. By comparing 20 Frontier Models against both pluralistic and Christian-specific criteria, we show that current AI systems are not worldview-neutral. Instead, they default to a Procedural Secularism that lacks the grounding necessary to sustain theological coherence, resulting in a systematic performance decline of approximately 17 points across all dimensions of flourishing. Most critically, there is a 31-point decline in the Faith and Spirituality dimension. These findings suggest that the performance gap in values alignment is not a technical limitation, but arises from training objectives that prioritize broad acceptability and safety over deep, internally coherent moral or theological reasoning.
机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来，可能存在错误，请以论文正文为准。
