arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 2603.26250cs.CV

面向自主无人机修剪的实时枝条到工具距离估计:从仿真到Jetson部署的五个DEFOM-立体变体基准测试

Real-Time Branch-to-Tool Distance Estimation for Autonomous UAV Pruning: Benchmarking Five DEFOM-Stereo Variants from Simulation to Jetson Deployment

Centre for Data Science;Department of Computer Science

Yida Lin, Bing Xue, Mengjie Zhang, Sam Schofield, Richard Green

AI总结:

本文通过训练五个DEFOM-Stereo变体,在仿真数据集上实现了实时枝条到工具距离估计,其中DEFOM-PrunePlus在部署精度与速度间取得最佳平衡,而ViT-S作为未来硬件的参考模型。

摘要:

自主无人机树修剪是一项安全关键的现实任务:机载感知系统必须实时估计修剪工具到细枝的度量距离,以使无人机能够接近、对准并操作修剪器而不发生碰撞。我们通过在任务特定的合成数据集上训练五个DEFOM-Stereo变体,并在NVIDIA Jetson Orin Super 16 GB上部署检查点来解决此问题。训练语料库是在Unreal Engine 5中构建,使用模拟ZED Mini立体相机捕捉了115个树实例在三个视角下2米距离的5,520对立体图像;密集的EXR深度图为细枝提供了精确且空间完整的监督。在合成测试集上,DEFOM-Stereo ViT-S在深度域准确度(EPE 1.74 px,D1-all 5.81%,delta-1 95.90%,深度MAE 23.40 cm)方面表现最佳,但其Jetson推理速度(约2.2 FPS,约450 ms每帧)仍太慢,无法支持响应的闭环工具控制。新引入的平衡变体DEFOM-PrunePlus(约21M主干,Jetson上约3.3 FPS)提供了最佳的可部署精度-速度权衡(EPE 5.87 px,深度MAE 64.26 cm,delta-1 87.59%):其帧率足以支持实时引导,其深度精度支持在2米操作范围内安全的枝条接近规划。轻量级的DEFOM-PruneStereo(约6.9 FPS)和DEFOM-PruneNano(约8.5 FPS)运行速度快但牺牲了大量精度(深度MAE > 57 cm),使估计过于不可靠以安全操作。在真实照片上的零次推理验证了全容量模型保留枝条几何结构,验证了仿真到现实的迁移。我们得出结论,DEFOM-PrunePlus为机载距离估计提供了最实用的精度-延迟平衡,而ViT-S作为未来硬件的参考模型。

英文摘要:

Autonomous tree pruning with unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) is a safety-critical real-world task: the onboard perception system must estimate the metric distance from a cutting tool to thin tree branches in real time so that the UAV can approach, align, and actuate the pruner without collision. We address this problem by training five variants of DEFOM-Stereo - a recent foundation-model-based stereo matcher - on a task-specific synthetic dataset and deploying the checkpoints on an NVIDIA Jetson Orin Super 16 GB. The training corpus is built in Unreal Engine 5 with a simulated ZED Mini stereo camera capturing 5,520 stereo pairs across 115 tree instances from three viewpoints at 2m distance; dense EXR depth maps provide exact, spatially complete supervision for thin branches. On the synthetic test set, DEFOM-Stereo ViT-S achieves the best depth-domain accuracy (EPE 1.74 px, D1-all 5.81%, delta-1 95.90%, depth MAE 23.40 cm) but its Jetson inference speed of ~2.2 FPS (~450 ms per frame) remains too slow for responsive closed-loop tool control. A newly introduced balanced variant, DEFOM-PrunePlus (~21M backbone, ~3.3 FPS on Jetson), offers the best deployable accuracy-speed trade-off (EPE 5.87 px, depth MAE 64.26 cm, delta-1 87.59%): its frame rate is sufficient for real-time guidance and its depth accuracy supports safe branch approach planning at the 2m operating range. The lightweight DEFOM-PruneStereo (~6.9 FPS) and DEFOM-PruneNano (~8.5 FPS) run fast but sacrifice substantial accuracy (depth MAE > 57 cm), making estimates too unreliable for safe actuation. Zero-shot inference on real photographs confirms that full-capacity models preserve branch geometry, validating the sim-to-real transfer. We conclude that DEFOM-PrunePlus provides the most practical accuracy-latency balance for onboard distance estimation, while ViT-S serves as the reference for future hardware.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑