arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 2512.03427cs.CV

深度立体匹配方法在无人机林业应用中的泛化能力评估

Generalization Evaluation of Deep Stereo Matching Methods for UAV-Based Forestry Applications

Centre for Data Science and Artificial Intelligence(数据科学与人工智能中心);Victoria University of Wellington(惠灵顿维多利亚大学);Department of Computer Science and Software Engineering(计算机科学与软件工程系);University of Canterbury(坎特伯雷大学)

Yida Lin, Bing Xue, Mengjie Zhang, Sam Schofield, Richard Green

AI总结:

本文首次系统评估了八种深度立体匹配方法在无人机林业应用中的泛化能力,揭示了不同方法在不同场景下的性能差异。

摘要:

自主无人机林业作业需要具有强跨领域泛化能力的稳健深度估计方法。然而,现有评估集中在城市和室内场景,留下的关键空白是专门用于植被密集环境的评估。我们首次系统地对八种最先进的立体匹配方法进行了零样本评估,这些方法涵盖了迭代细化、基础模型和零样本适应范式。所有方法均在Scene Flow上训练,并在四个标准基准(ETH3D、KITTI 2012/2015、Middlebury)以及一个新的包含5313对的坎特伯雷林业数据集(使用ZED Mini相机拍摄,1920x1080)上进行评估。性能揭示了场景依赖性模式:基础模型在结构化场景中表现优异(BridgeDepth在ETH3D上的表现为0.23像素,KITTI上的表现为0.83-1.07像素;DEFOM在各基准上的表现为0.35-4.65像素),而迭代方法在跨领域中保持稳健(IGEV++:0.36-6.77像素;IGEV:0.33-21.91像素)。关键发现:RAFT-Stereo在ETH3D上表现出灾难性失败(26.23像素EPE,98%的错误率),这是由于负的视差预测,而在KITTI上表现正常(0.90-1.11像素)。对坎特伯雷林业数据集的定性评估发现DEFOM是植被深度估计的最佳基准线方法,相比IGEV++,在深度平滑度、遮挡处理和跨领域一致性方面表现更优,尽管IGEV++在细节保留方面更精细。

英文摘要:

Autonomous UAV forestry operations require robust depth estimation methods with strong cross-domain generalization. However, existing evaluations focus on urban and indoor scenarios, leaving a critical gap for specialized vegetation-dense environments. We present the first systematic zero-shot evaluation of eight state-of-the-art stereo methods--RAFT-Stereo, IGEV, IGEV++, BridgeDepth, StereoAnywhere, DEFOM (plus baseline methods ACVNet, PSMNet, TCstereo)--spanning iterative refinement, foundation model, and zero-shot adaptation paradigms. All methods are trained exclusively on Scene Flow and evaluated without fine-tuning on four standard benchmarks (ETH3D, KITTI 2012/2015, Middlebury) plus a novel 5,313-pair Canterbury forestry dataset captured with ZED Mini camera (1920x1080). Performance reveals scene-dependent patterns: foundation models excel on structured scenes (BridgeDepth: 0.23 px on ETH3D, 0.83-1.07 px on KITTI; DEFOM: 0.35-4.65 px across benchmarks), while iterative methods maintain cross-domain robustness (IGEV++: 0.36-6.77 px; IGEV: 0.33-21.91 px). Critical finding: RAFT-Stereo exhibits catastrophic ETH3D failure (26.23 px EPE, 98 percent error rate) due to negative disparity predictions, while performing normally on KITTI (0.90-1.11 px). Qualitative evaluation on Canterbury forestry dataset identifies DEFOM as the optimal gold-standard baseline for vegetation depth estimation, exhibiting superior depth smoothness, occlusion handling, and cross-domain consistency compared to IGEV++, despite IGEV++'s finer detail preservation.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑