arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2603.25035cs.AI
收藏

视觉语言模型压缩的机理解释

Mechanistically Interpreting Compression in Vision-Language Models

Indian Institute of Technology Jodhpur(印度理工学院焦特布尔分校);AIM Intelligence;National Institute of Technology Agartala(国立阿加尔塔拉理工学院);Fordham University(福特汉姆大学);University of Fukui(福井大学);Independent Researcher(独立研究员)

Veeraraju Elluru, Arth Singh, Roberto Aguero, Ajay Agarwal, Debojyoti Das, Hreetam Paul

AI总结:

本文通过因果电路分析和交叉编码器特征比较,研究了剪枝和量化对视觉语言模型内部结构的影响,并提出VLMSafe-420基准测试,揭示压缩对安全行为的影响。

摘要:

压缩的视觉语言模型(VLMs)被广泛用于降低内存和计算成本,使其成为实际部署的合适选择。然而,压缩这些模型会引发关于内部计算和安全行为是否保持的担忧。在本文中,我们使用因果电路分析和基于交叉编码器的特征比较,研究了剪枝和量化如何从根本上改变代表性VLMs的内部结构。我们观察到,剪枝通常保持电路结构完整,但旋转和衰减内部特征,而量化在更高层次上修改电路,却使存活特征更好地对齐。利用这一见解,我们还引入了VLMSafe-420,一个新颖的基准测试,它在各种安全类别中将有害输入与匹配的无害反事实配对。我们的发现表明,剪枝导致真实拒绝行为急剧下降,表明压缩的选择具有安全影响。

英文摘要:

Compressed vision-language models (VLMs) are widely used to reduce memory and compute costs, making them a suitable choice for real-world deployment. However, compressing these models raises concerns about whether internal computations and safety behaviors are preserved. In this work, we use causal circuit analysis and crosscoder-based feature comparisons to examine how pruning and quantization fundamentally change the internals across representative VLMs. We observe that pruning generally keeps circuit structure intact but rotates and attenuates internal features, while quantization modifies the circuits at a higher level yet leaves the surviving features better aligned. Leveraging this insight, we also introduce VLMSafe-420, a novel benchmark that pairs harmful inputs with matched benign counterfactuals across various safety categories. Our findings show that pruning causes a sharp drop in genuine refusal behavior, suggesting that the choice of compression has safety implications.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑