arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2602.07547q-bio.NCcs.AIcs.CLcs.LG

语言属性与模型规模在脑编码中的作用:从小型到压缩语言模型

Linguistic properties and model scale in brain encoding: from small to compressed language models

TU Berlin(柏林技术大学);IIIT-Hyderabad(海得拉巴理工学院);GE HealthCare(通用电气医疗);AWS AI Labs, Amazon(亚马逊AI实验室);Microsoft Research, Bangalore, India(微软研究院,班加罗尔,印度);Microsoft, Hyderabad, India(微软,海得拉巴,印度);IIT Delhi(德里理工学院)

Subba Reddy Oota, Vijay Rowtula, Satya Sai Srinath Namburi, Khushbu Pahwa, Anant Khandelwal, Manish Gupta, Tanmoy Chakraborty, Bapi S. Raju

AI总结:

研究发现小型语言模型在脑一致性上可与大模型媲美,压缩不影响脑可预测性,挑战了神经扩展的常见假设。

摘要:

近期研究表明,扩大大型语言模型(LLMs)的规模能提高其与人类脑活动的一致性,但尚不清楚这些增益的驱动力以及哪些表征属性负责。尽管更大的模型通常能提供更好的任务性能和脑一致性,但它们越来越难以进行机理分析。这提出了一个根本性问题:捕捉脑相关表征所需的最小模型容量是什么?为了解决这个问题,我们系统地研究了限制模型规模和数值精度如何影响脑一致性。我们通过预测自然语言理解过程中的fMRI响应,比较全精度LLMs、小型语言模型(SLMs)和压缩变体(量化和剪枝)。在最多14B参数的模型家族中,我们发现3B SLMs在脑可预测性上与更大的LLMs难以区分,而1B模型则显著退化,特别是在语义语言区域。脑一致性对压缩具有显著的鲁棒性:大多数量化和剪枝方法保留了神经可预测性,而GPTQ是一个例外。语言探测揭示了任务性能和脑可预测性之间的脱节:压缩会破坏话语、语法和形态,但脑可预测性基本保持不变。总体而言,脑一致性在适度的模型规模下达到饱和,并且对压缩具有韧性,挑战了关于神经扩展的常见假设,并推动了用于脑一致语言建模的紧凑模型。

英文摘要:

Recent work has shown that scaling large language models (LLMs) improves their alignment with human brain activity, yet it remains unclear what drives these gains and which representational properties are responsible. Although larger models often yield better task performance and brain alignment, they are increasingly difficult to analyze mechanistically. This raises a fundamental question: what is the minimal model capacity required to capture brain-relevant representations? To address this question, we systematically investigate how constraining model scale and numerical precision affects brain alignment. We compare full-precision LLMs, small language models (SLMs), and compressed variants (quantized and pruned) by predicting fMRI responses during naturalistic language comprehension. Across model families up to 14B parameters, we find that 3B SLMs achieve brain predictivity indistinguishable from larger LLMs, whereas 1B models degrade substantially, particularly in semantic language regions. Brain alignment is remarkably robust to compression: most quantization and pruning methods preserve neural predictivity, with GPTQ as a consistent exception. Linguistic probing reveals a dissociation between task performance and brain predictivity: compression degrades discourse, syntax, and morphology, yet brain predictivity remains largely unchanged. Overall, brain alignment saturates at modest model scales and is resilient to compression, challenging common assumptions about neural scaling and motivating compact models for brain-aligned language modeling.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑