arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2401.03376q-bio.NC

如何优化神经科学数据利用与实验设计以推进视觉和语言认知的脑模型?

How to optimize neuroscience data utilization and experiment design for advancing brain models of visual and linguistic cognition?

Greta Tuckute, Dawn Finzi, Eshed Margalit, Joel Zylberberg, SueYeon Chung, Alona Fyshe, Evelina Fedorenko, Nikolaus Kriegeskorte, Jacob Yates, Kalanit Grill-Spector, Kohitij Kar

AI总结:

本文围绕如何优化神经科学数据利用与实验设计以推进视觉和语言认知脑模型,比较定性见解与原始数据训练、无模型与基于模型的实验设计,并提出协同开发、数据与模型共享等方向。

摘要:

近年来,神经科学在构建大脑活动与行为的大规模人工神经网络(ANN)模型方面取得了显著进展。然而,对于收集数据和设计实验以开发下一代模型的最有效方式,目前尚未形成共识。本文探讨了在视觉和语言领域围绕这一主题出现的争议性观点。具体而言,我们讨论两个关键问题。第一,我们权衡使用实证结果的定性见解与使用原始实验数据来训练模型的利弊。第二,我们考虑无模型(基于直觉)与基于模型的数据收集方法,特别是实验设计和刺激选择,以实现最优模型开发。最后,我们探讨了在实验设计与模型构建中发展协同方法所面临的挑战,包括鼓励数据和模型共享,以及对现有模型进行迭代补充所带来的影响。本文的目标是讨论决策要点,并为实验研究者和模型开发者在理解大脑的探索中提出方向。

英文摘要:

In recent years, neuroscience has made significant progress in building large-scale artificial neural network (ANN) models of brain activity and behavior. However, there is no consensus on the most efficient ways to collect data and design experiments to develop the next generation of models. This article explores the controversial opinions that have emerged on this topic in the domain of vision and language. Specifically, we address two critical points. First, we weigh the pros and cons of using qualitative insights from empirical results versus raw experimental data to train models. Second, we consider model-free (intuition-based) versus model-based approaches for data collection, specifically experimental design and stimulus selection, for optimal model development. Finally, we consider the challenges of developing a synergistic approach to experimental design and model building, including encouraging data and model sharing and the implications of iterative additions to existing models. The goal of the paper is to discuss decision points and propose directions for both experimenters and model developers in the quest to understand the brain.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑