arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
北美退伍军人节(Veterans Day),12 日无更新
arXiv 2603.23909cs.AI
收藏

DUPLEX:基于LLM驱动信息提取的代理双系统规划

DUPLEX: Agentic Dual-System Planning via LLM-Driven Information Extraction

Midea Corporate Research Center(美的集团研发中心);Midea Group(美的集团);Northeastern University(东北大学);Engineering Department(工程部)

Keru Hua, Ding Wang, Yaoying Gu, Xiaoguang Ma

AI总结:

DUPLEX通过限制LLM进行结构化语义 grounding,结合符号规划器实现可靠规划,优于现有端到端和混合LLM基线。

摘要:

尽管大语言模型(LLM)在机器人任务规划中提供语义灵活性,但其易产生幻觉和逻辑不一致限制了在长时域中的可靠性。为弥合无结构环境与严谨计划合成之间的差距,我们提出DUPLEX,一种基于代理的双系统神经符号架构,严格限制LLM仅进行模式引导的信息提取而非端到端规划或代码生成。在我们的框架中,一个前馈的快速系统利用轻量级LLM从自然语言中提取实体、关系等,并确定性地映射到计划领域定义语言(PDDL)问题文件,供经典符号规划器处理。为解决复杂或未指定的场景,慢系统仅在规划失败时被激活,利用求解器诊断驱动高容量LLM进行迭代反思和修复。在12个经典和家庭规划领域中的广泛评估表明,DUPLEX在成功率和可靠性方面显著优于现有端到端和混合LLM基线。这些结果证实,关键不在于让LLM计划得更好,而在于限制LLM只做它擅长的结构化语义 grounding,并将逻辑计划合成交给符号规划器。

英文摘要:

While Large Language Models (LLMs) provide semantic flexibility for robotic task planning, their susceptibility to hallucination and logical inconsistency limits their reliability in long-horizon domains. To bridge the gap between unstructured environments and rigorous plan synthesis, we propose DUPLEX, an agentic dual-system neuro-symbolic architecture that strictly confines the LLM to schema-guided information extraction rather than end-to-end planning or code generation. In our framework, a feed-forward Fast System utilizes a lightweight LLM to extract entities, relations etc. from natural language, deterministically mapping them into a Planning Domain Definition Language (PDDL) problem file for a classical symbolic planner. To resolve complex or underspecified scenarios, a Slow System is activated exclusively upon planning failure, leveraging solver diagnostics to drive a high-capacity LLM in iterative reflection and repair. Extensive evaluations across 12 classical and household planning domains demonstrate that DUPLEX significantly outperforms existing end-to-end and hybrid LLM baselines in both success rate and reliability. These results confirm that The key is not to make the LLM plan better, but to restrict the LLM to the part it is good at - structured semantic grounding - and leave logical plan synthesis to a symbolic planner.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑