arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
北美退伍军人节(Veterans Day),12 日无更新
arXiv 2603.09533cs.AIcs.CL
收藏

通过基于大语言模型的人格适应增强反驳效果

Enhancing Debunking Effectiveness through LLM-based Personality Adaptation

Pietro Dell'Oglio, Alessandro Bondielli, Francesco Marcelloni, Lucia C. Passaro

AI总结:

本研究通过基于LLM的人格适应技术生成个性化虚假新闻反驳信息,发现开放性特质提升说服力,神经质降低说服力,并探讨了多模型评估的必要性及伦理问题。

摘要:

本研究提出了一种生成个性化虚假新闻反驳信息的新方法,通过提示大语言模型(LLMs)使用基于Big Five人格特质(外向性、宜人性、尽责性、神经质和开放性)的输入。我们的方法指导LLMs将通用反驳内容转化为针对特定人格档案的个性化版本。为了评估这些转换的有效性,我们使用另一个独立的LLM作为自动评估器,模拟相应的人格特质,从而避免了需要昂贵的人类评估小组。我们的结果表明,个性化信息通常比通用信息更具说服力。我们还发现,开放性特质倾向于增加说服力,而神经质可能降低它。不同LLM评估者之间的差异表明,使用多个模型能提供更清晰的画面。总体而言,这项工作展示了一种利用LLMs创建更针对性反驳信息的实用方法,同时也引发了关于此类技术可能如何被使用的重大伦理问题。

英文摘要:

This study proposes a novel methodology for generating personalized fake news debunking messages by prompting Large Language Models (LLMs) with persona-based inputs aligned to the Big Five personality traits: Extraversion, Agreeableness, Conscientiousness, Neuroticism, and Openness. Our approach guides LLMs to transform generic debunking content into personalized versions tailored to specific personality profiles. To assess the effectiveness of these transformations, we employ a separate LLM as an automated evaluator simulating corresponding personality traits, thereby eliminating the need for costly human evaluation panels. Our results show that personalized messages are generally seen as more persuasive than generic ones. We also find that traits like Openness tend to increase persuadability, while Neuroticism can lower it. Differences between LLM evaluators suggest that using multiple models provides a clearer picture. Overall, this work demonstrates a practical way to create more targeted debunking messages exploiting LLMs, while also raising important ethical questions about how such technology might be used.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑