arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2603.09435cs.AI
收藏

AI行为评估基准:为NLP和RAG系统设计的开放、透明且可复现的评估数据集

AI Act Evaluation Benchmark: An Open, Transparent, and Reproducible Evaluation Dataset for NLP and RAG Systems

Athanasios Davvetas, Michael Papademas, Xenia Ziouvelou, Vangelis Karkaletsis

AI总结:

本文提出了一种开放透明的数据集,用于评估NLP和RAG系统在欧盟AI法案下的合规性,通过生成风险等级分类等任务提升评估效率。

摘要:

人工智能在异构公共和社会领域的快速推广已经加剧了遵守监管标准和框架的需求。欧盟人工智能法案在监管领域已成为一个里程碑。开发能够评估人工智能系统合规性的解决方案通常受到资源不足的限制,阻碍了半自动化或自动评估性能。这产生了对人工工作的需求,通常容易出错、资源有限或仅限于未被法规明确描述的情况。本文提出了一种开放、透明且可复现的方法,用于创建一个促进NLP模型评估的数据集,特别关注RAG系统。我们开发了一个包含风险等级分类、文章检索、义务生成和问答任务的数据集,用于欧盟人工智能法案。数据集文件以适合机器到机器的格式存储。为了生成文件,我们利用领域知识作为解释基础,结合大语言模型的处理和推理能力,生成场景及其相应任务。我们的方法展示了一种利用语言模型进行基于现实的生成的方法,具有高文档相关性。此外,我们克服了诸如在欧盟人工智能法案中未明确定义的风险等级决策边界等限制,例如有限和最小的案例。最后,我们通过评估一个基于RAG的解决方案来展示数据集的有效性,该解决方案在禁止和高风险场景中的F1得分为0.87和0.85。

英文摘要:

The rapid rollout of AI in heterogeneous public and societal sectors has subsequently escalated the need for compliance with regulatory standards and frameworks. The EU AI Act has emerged as a landmark in the regulatory landscape. The development of solutions that elicit the level of AI systems' compliance with such standards is often limited by the lack of resources, hindering the semi-automated or automated evaluation of their performance. This generates the need for manual work, which is often error-prone, resource-limited or limited to cases not clearly described by the regulation. This paper presents an open, transparent, and reproducible method of creating a resource that facilitates the evaluation of NLP models with a strong focus on RAG systems. We have developed a dataset that contain the tasks of risk-level classification, article retrieval, obligation generation, and question-answering for the EU AI Act. The dataset files are in a machine-to-machine appropriate format. To generate the files, we utilise domain knowledge as an exegetical basis, combining with the processing and reasoning power of large language models to generate scenarios along with the respective tasks. Our methodology demonstrates a way to harness language models for grounded generation with high document relevancy. Besides, we overcome limitations such as navigating the decision boundaries of risk-levels that are not explicitly defined within the EU AI Act, such as limited and minimal cases. Finally, we demonstrate our dataset's effectiveness by evaluating a RAG-based solution that reaches 0.87 and 0.85 F1-score for prohibited and high-risk scenarios.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑