arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2603.09337cs.CVcs.AI
收藏

超越规模:在零和环境中评估大语言模型的战略推理和快速决策能力

Beyond Scaling: Assessing Strategic Reasoning and Rapid Decision-Making Capability of LLMs in Zero-sum Environments

Yang Li, Xing Chen, Yutao Liu, Gege Qi, Yanxian BI, Zizhe Wang, Yunjian Zhang, Yao Zhu

AI总结:

本文提出STAR基准,评估大语言模型在零和环境中的战略推理和快速决策能力,揭示推理深度与及时行动能力的权衡。

摘要:

大语言模型(LLMs)在静态推理基准测试中表现强劲,但其作为交互代理在对抗性、时间敏感环境中有效性的效果尚不明确。现有评估大多将推理视为单次能力,忽略了对手意识决策、时间约束和压力下的执行挑战。本文引入了战略战术代理推理(STAR)基准,一个多代理评估框架,通过1对1零和竞争互动评估LLMs,将推理框架为迭代、适应性决策过程。STAR支持回合制和实时设置,使在统一环境中可控分析长周期战略规划和快速战术执行。基于模块化架构,具有标准化API和完全实现的执行引擎,STAR促进可重复评估和灵活的任务定制。为超越二元胜负结果,我们引入了战略评估套件,不仅评估竞争成功,还评估战略行为的质量,如执行效率和结果稳定性。广泛的成对评估揭示了显著的策略执行差距:尽管推理密集型模型在回合制设置中占优,但其推理延迟往往导致实时场景中表现较差,其中更快的指令调优模型占上风。这些结果表明,在交互环境中战略智能不仅取决于推理深度,还取决于将计划转化为及时行动的能力,使STAR成为研究这种权衡的原理性基准。

英文摘要:

Large Language Models (LLMs) have achieved strong performance on static reasoning benchmarks, yet their effectiveness as interactive agents operating in adversarial, time-sensitive environments remains poorly understood. Existing evaluations largely treat reasoning as a single-shot capability, overlooking the challenges of opponent-aware decision-making, temporal constraints, and execution under pressure. This paper introduces Strategic Tactical Agent Reasoning (STAR) Benchmark, a multi-agent evaluation framework that assesses LLMs through 1v1 zero-sum competitive interactions, framing reasoning as an iterative, adaptive decision-making process. STAR supports both turn-based and real-time settings, enabling controlled analysis of long-horizon strategic planning and fast-paced tactical execution within a unified environment. Built on a modular architecture with a standardized API and fully implemented execution engine, STAR facilitates reproducible evaluation and flexible task customization. To move beyond binary win-loss outcomes, we introduce a Strategic Evaluation Suite that assesses not only competitive success but also the quality of strategic behavior, such as execution efficiency and outcome stability. Extensive pairwise evaluations reveal a pronounced strategy-execution gap: while reasoning-intensive models dominate turn-based settings, their inference latency often leads to inferior performance in real-time scenarios, where faster instruction-tuned models prevail. These results show that strategic intelligence in interactive environments depends not only on reasoning depth, but also on the ability to translate plans into timely actions, positioning STAR as a principled benchmark for studying this trade-off in competitive, dynamic settings.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑