arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2603.04083cs.CL
收藏

多候选人类后编辑机器翻译中的回顾性质量预测实验

Hindsight Quality Prediction Experiments in Multi-Candidate Human-Post-Edited Machine Translation

Malik Marmonier, Benoît Sagot, Rachel Bawden

AI总结:

本文通过回顾实验探讨LLMs对机器翻译质量预测范式的影响,发现架构转变改变了预测方法的可靠性并缓解了文档级翻译的挑战。

摘要:

本文研究了两种互补的机器翻译(MT)质量预测范式:源侧难度预测和候选侧质量估计(QE)。大型语言模型(LLMs)的快速应用正在重塑研究领域,但其对已建立的质量预测范式的影响仍不明确。我们通过一系列“回顾”实验研究了这一问题,数据集来自一个真实的MT后编辑(MTPE)项目,包含6000多个英语源段,每个段落有九个翻译假设,来自多种传统神经MT系统和先进LLMs,均经单一最终人类后编辑参考评估。使用肯德尔等级相关性,我们评估了源侧难度度量、候选侧QE模型和位置启发式方法对两种黄金标准分数(TER作为后编辑努力的代理,COMET作为人类判断的代理)的预测能力。我们的发现表明,向LLMs的架构转变改变了已建立的质量预测方法的可靠性,同时减轻了文档级翻译中的先前挑战。

英文摘要:

This paper investigates two complementary paradigms for predicting machine translation (MT) quality: source-side difficulty prediction and candidate-side quality estimation (QE). The rapid adoption of Large Language Models (LLMs) into MT workflows is reshaping the research landscape, yet its impact on established quality prediction paradigms remains underexplored. We study this issue through a series of "hindsight" experiments on a unique, multi-candidate dataset resulting from a genuine MT post-editing (MTPE) project. The dataset consists of over 6,000 English source segments with nine translation hypotheses from a diverse set of traditional neural MT systems and advanced LLMs, all evaluated against a single, final human post-edited reference. Using Kendall's rank correlation, we assess the predictive power of source-side difficulty metrics, candidate-side QE models and position heuristics against two gold-standard scores: TER (as a proxy for post-editing effort) and COMET (as a proxy for human judgment). Our findings highlight that the architectural shift towards LLMs alters the reliability of established quality prediction methods while simultaneously mitigating previous challenges in document-level translation.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑