arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 2410.00545cs.CL
收藏

危害何在?通过一项以人为中心的研究量化机器翻译中性别偏见的实际影响

What the Harm? Quantifying the Tangible Impact of Gender Bias in Machine Translation with a Human-centered Study

Fondazione Bruno Kessler(布鲁诺·凯塞勒基金会);University of Groningen(格罗宁根大学)

Beatrice Savoldi, Sara Papi, Matteo Negri, Ana Guerberof, Luisa Bentivogli

AI总结:

本研究针对现有机器翻译性别偏见评估多依赖自动化方法、难以反映实际下游危害的问题,通过90名参与者的译后编辑行为实验,证实女性相关内容译后编辑成本更高,且现有偏见测量无法反映该差异,倡导以人为中心的偏见评估方法。

摘要:

机器翻译(MT)中的性别偏见被公认为会对个人和社会造成危害的问题。然而,该领域的研究进展很少涉及最终的机器翻译用户——人,也未说明他们可能如何受到有偏见技术的影响。当前的评估通常局限于自动化方法,这类方法对性别差异可能产生的下游影响只能给出不透明的估计。我们开展了一项广泛的以人为中心的研究,以检验机器翻译中的偏见是否以及在多大程度上会带来具有实际成本的危害,例如女性和男性之间的服务质量差距。为此,我们收集了90名参与者的行为数据,这些参与者对机器翻译输出进行译后编辑以确保性别翻译正确。在多个数据集、语言和用户类型中,我们的研究表明,女性相关内容的译后编辑需要显著更多的技术和时间投入,相应地也带来更高的财务成本。然而,现有的偏见测量方法未能反映出所发现的差异。我们的研究结果支持采用以人为中心的方法,这类方法能够说明偏见的社会影响。

英文摘要:

Gender bias in machine translation (MT) is recognized as an issue that can harm people and society. And yet, advancements in the field rarely involve people, the final MT users, or inform how they might be impacted by biased technologies. Current evaluations are often restricted to automatic methods, which offer an opaque estimate of what the downstream impact of gender disparities might be. We conduct an extensive human-centered study to examine if and to what extent bias in MT brings harms with tangible costs, such as quality of service gaps across women and men. To this aim, we collect behavioral data from 90 participants, who post-edited MT outputs to ensure correct gender translation. Across multiple datasets, languages, and types of users, our study shows that feminine post-editing demands significantly more technical and temporal effort, also corresponding to higher financial costs. Existing bias measurements, however, fail to reflect the found disparities. Our findings advocate for human-centered approaches that can inform the societal impact of bias.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑