arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 2603.02540cs.AI
收藏

基于神经心理学的大型语言模型认知能力评估

A Neuropsychologically Grounded Evaluation of LLM Cognitive Abilities

School of Computing, KAIST, Daejeon, South Korea(韩国科学技术院计算机科学学院)

Faiz Ghifari Haznitrama, Faeyza Rishad Ardi, Alice Oh

AI总结:

本文提出NeuroCognition基准测试,通过神经心理学测试评估LLM的认知能力,揭示其在图像和复杂任务上的不足,并展示其改进LLM的潜力。

摘要:

大型语言模型(LLMs)在10个基准测试中表现出统一的'通用因素'能力,这一发现通过我们对156个模型的因子分析得到验证,但它们仍然在简单的、人类认为琐碎的任务上表现不佳。这是因为当前的基准测试侧重于任务完成,未能探测出突出这些行为的基础认知能力。我们通过引入基于三种改编的神经心理学测试的NeuroCognition基准测试来解决这一问题:瑞文渐进矩阵(抽象关系推理)、空间工作记忆(维持和系统性搜索)以及威斯康星卡片排序测试(认知灵活性)。我们的评估发现,尽管模型在文本上表现强劲,但在图像和复杂性增加时表现下降。此外,我们发现复杂推理并非普遍有益,而简单的、人类样的策略则带来部分收益。我们还发现NeuroCognition与标准通用能力基准测试呈正相关,同时仍测量出超出这些基准的其他认知能力。总体而言,NeuroCognition强调了当前LLMs与人类样智能的一致性以及其缺乏核心适应认知的地方,展示了其作为可验证、可扩展来源以改进LLMs的潜力。

英文摘要:

Large language models (LLMs) display a unified "general factor" of capability across 10 benchmarks (a finding confirmed by our factor analysis of 156 models), yet they still struggle with simple, trivial tasks for humans. This is because current benchmarks focus on task completion, failing to probe the foundational cognitive abilities that highlight these behaviors. We address this by introducing the NeuroCognition benchmark, grounded in three adapted neuropsychological tests targeting distinct foundational cognitive components: Raven's Progressive Matrices (abstract relational reasoning), Spatial Working Memory (goal-directed spatial updating), and the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (cognitive flexibility). Our evaluation reveals that while models perform strongly on text, their performance degrades for images and with increased complexity. Comparison with a human baseline shows that LLMs and humans fail at different parts of the same tasks. Furthermore, we observe that complex reasoning is not universally beneficial, whereas simple, human-like strategies yield partial gains. We also find that NeuroCognition correlates positively with standard general-capability benchmarks, while still measuring distinct cognitive abilities beyond them. Overall, NeuroCognition emphasizes where current LLMs align with human-like intelligence and where they lack core adaptive cognition, showing the potential to serve as a verifiable, scalable source for improving LLMs.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑