arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
稍安勿躁,官方尚未更新
arXiv 2603.00570physics.geo-ph
收藏

基于物理的地震危险与风险评估:地震预测的新范式

Physics-Based Seismic Hazard and Risk Assessment: A New Paradigm for Earthquake Forecasting

Institute of Risk Analysis, Prediction and Management (Risks-X), Academy for Advanced Interdisciplinary Studies, Southern University of Science and Technology (SUSTech)(南方科技大学高等交叉研究院风险、预测与管理研究所);Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV)(意大利国家地球物理学与火山学研究所)

Davide Zaccagnino, Didier Sornette

AI总结:

本文提出SHARP框架,通过量化模型与物理约束的距离,改进地震危险评估中的epistemic不确定性处理。

摘要:

在概率地震危险评估(PSHA)中,epistemic不确定性通常通过逻辑树框架来解决,该框架结合加权的替代模型来表征可能的危险结果范围。隐含在这一方法中的关键假设是:现有的模型类能够充分代表控制断层网络的底层物理。然而,当前的公式仍然高度简化,忽略了非线性相互作用、多样的断层滑动模式、多尺度耦合以及控制大地震成核和演化的涌现动态。因此,标准的epistemic不确定性处理可能会引入系统性的危险偏差,并显著低估预测不确定性。为了正式化这一限制,我们引入SHARP(基于物理的地震危险与风险评估),这是一个新的框架,其重点从在不完美模型之间进行选择转向量化这些模型与物理和观测约束之间的集体距离。SHARP的核心是模型充分性距离(MAD),一个衡量模型不足的定量指标。MAD结合(i)一个按地震矩加权的评分函数,其与地震矩成比例,以反映大事件对社会和经济影响的不成比例性,以及(ii)从地壳观测和地震性统计特性中导出的兼容性措施。我们通过将其应用于南加州地震性频率-大小分布来说明这一方法。SHARP为超越传统epistemic不确定性向基于物理的地震危险与风险评估框架迈进奠定了坚实基础。

英文摘要:

Epistemic uncertainty in probabilistic seismic hazard assessment (PSHA) is commonly addressed through a logic-tree framework that combines weighted alternative models to characterize the range of plausible hazard outcomes. Implicit in this approach is a critical assumption: that the available model class provides an adequate representation of the underlying physics governing fault networks. Yet current formulations remain highly simplified, neglecting nonlinear interactions, diverse fault slip modes, multi-scale coupling, and the emergent dynamics that govern the nucleation and evolution of large earthquakes. As a result, the standard treatment of epistemic uncertainty may introduce systematic hazard bias and substantially underestimate forecast uncertainty. To formalize this limitation, we introduce SHARP (Seismic Hazard Assessment and Risks with Physics), a new framework that shifts the focus from selecting among imperfect models to quantifying their collective distance from physical and observational constraints. Central to SHARP is the Model Adequacy Distance (MAD), a quantitative metric of model inadequacy. MAD combines (i) a moment-weighted scoring function scaling with seismic moment to reflect the disproportionate social and economic impact of large events and (ii) compatibility measures derived from geodetic observations and statistical properties of seismicity. We illustrate the approach with an application to the frequency-magnitude distribution of Southern California seismicity. SHARP establishes a rigorous foundation for moving beyond conventional epistemic uncertainty toward a physics-grounded framework for seismic hazard and risk assessment.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑