arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 2602.23199cs.AI
收藏

SC-Arena: 一种用于具有知识增强评估的单细胞推理的自然语言基准

SC-Arena: A Natural Language Benchmark for Single-Cell Reasoning with Knowledge-Augmented Evaluation

Software College, Northeastern University(东北大学软件学院);Shenzhen University of Advanced Technology(深圳大学先进技术学院);Shenzhen Key Laboratory for High Performance Data Mining(深圳高性能数据挖掘重点实验室);Shenzhen Institutes of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences(深圳先进技术研究所,中国科学院);University of California, Irvine(加州大学 Irvine 分校);School of Biomedical Engineering, UNSW Sydney(悉尼大学生物医学工程学院)

Jiahao Zhao, Feng Jiang, Shaowei Qin, Zhonghui Zhang, Junhao Liu, Guibing Guo, Hamid Alinejad-Rokny, Min Yang

AI总结:

SC-Arena通过知识增强评估框架,为单细胞生物学中的LLM提供统一且可解释的评估方法,提升生物正确性和推理能力。

摘要:

大型语言模型(LLMs)越来越多地应用于科学研究,为知识发现和推理提供了新的能力。然而在单细胞生物学中,通用和专用LLMs的评估实践仍然不足:现有的基准在任务上碎片化,采用多项选择分类等格式,与现实世界使用脱节,并依赖缺乏可解释性和生物基础的度量标准。我们提出了SC-ARENA,一种针对单细胞基础模型的自然语言评估框架。SC-ARENA形式化了一种虚拟细胞抽象,通过表示内在属性和基因层面的相互作用,统一了评估目标。在此范式中,我们定义了五个自然语言任务(细胞类型注释、描述生成、扰动预测和科学问答),以探测细胞生物学中的核心推理能力。为克服 brittle string-matching 度量标准的局限性,我们引入了知识增强的评估,整合了外部本体、标记数据库和科学文献,以支持生物忠实和可解释的判断。在通用和领域专用LLMs上的实验和分析表明,(i)在虚拟细胞统一评估范式下,当前模型在生物复杂的任务上表现不均,尤其是需要机理或因果理解的任务;(ii)我们的知识增强评估框架确保了生物正确性,提供了可解释、证据支持的判断理由,并实现了高区分能力,克服了传统度量标准的脆弱性和不透明性。SC-Arena因此为单细胞生物学中的LLM评估提供了一个统一和可解释的框架,指向了开发与生物学对齐、可推广的基础模型的发展。

英文摘要:

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly applied in scientific research, offering new capabilities for knowledge discovery and reasoning. In single-cell biology, however, evaluation practices for both general and specialized LLMs remain inadequate: existing benchmarks are fragmented across tasks, adopt formats such as multiple-choice classification that diverge from real-world usage, and rely on metrics lacking interpretability and biological grounding. We present SC-ARENA, a natural language evaluation framework tailored to single-cell foundation models. SC-ARENA formalizes a virtual cell abstraction that unifies evaluation targets by representing both intrinsic attributes and gene-level interactions. Within this paradigm, we define five natural language tasks (cell type annotation, captioning, generation, perturbation prediction, and scientific QA) that probe core reasoning capabilities in cellular biology. To overcome the limitations of brittle string-matching metrics, we introduce knowledge-augmented evaluation, which incorporates external ontologies, marker databases, and scientific literature to support biologically faithful and interpretable judgments. Experiments and analysis across both general-purpose and domain-specialized LLMs demonstrate that (i) under the Virtual Cell unified evaluation paradigm, current models achieve uneven performance on biologically complex tasks, particularly those demanding mechanistic or causal understanding; and (ii) our knowledge-augmented evaluation framework ensures biological correctness, provides interpretable, evidence-grounded rationales, and achieves high discriminative capacity, overcoming the brittleness and opacity of conventional metrics. SC-Arena thus provides a unified and interpretable framework for assessing LLMs in single-cell biology, pointing toward the development of biology-aligned, generalizable foundation models.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑