arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2602.21779cs.CVcs.AI

超越静态伪影:一种用于视觉语言模型中视频深度伪造推理的取证基准

Beyond Static Artifacts: A Forensic Benchmark for Video Deepfake Reasoning in Vision Language Models

Institute of Artificial Intelligence, China Telecom (TeleAI)(人工智能研究院,中国电信(TeleAI));Peking University(北京大学);Fudan University(复旦大学)

Zheyuan Gu, Qingsong Zhao, Yusong Wang, Zhaohong Huang, Xinqi Li, Cheng Yuan, Jiaowei Shao, Chi Zhang, Xuelong Li

AI总结:

本文提出FAQ基准,通过多选任务提升视觉语言模型对视频深度伪造的时间推理能力,并通过实验验证其有效性。

摘要:

当前用于深度伪造检测的视觉语言模型(VLMs)在识别空间伪影方面表现优异,但忽略了视频伪造中的一个关键维度:时间不一致。将VLMs适应于推理这些动态线索仍是一个独特的挑战。为填补这一差距,我们提出了取证回答-提问(FAQ),一个大规模基准,将时间深度伪造分析制定为多选任务。FAQ引入了三级层次结构,逐步评估并使VLMs具备取证能力:(1)面部感知,测试识别静态视觉伪影的能力;(2)时间深度伪造定位,要求在帧间定位动态伪造伪影;(3)取证推理,挑战模型合成证据以得出最终真实性判断。我们对FAQ评估了一系列VLMs,并生成了相应的指令微调集FAQ-IT。广泛的实验表明,经过FAQ-IT微调的模型在域内和跨数据集检测基准上均取得了先进性能。消融研究进一步验证了我们关键设计选择的影响,确认FAQ是这些VLMs时间推理能力的驱动力。

英文摘要:

Current Vision-Language Models (VLMs) for deepfake detection excel at identifying spatial artifacts but overlook a critical dimension: temporal inconsistencies in video forgeries. Adapting VLMs to reason about these dynamic cues remains a distinct challenge. To bridge this gap, we propose Forensic Answer-Questioning (FAQ), a large-scale benchmark that formulates temporal deepfake analysis as a multiple-choice task. FAQ introduces a three-level hierarchy to progressively evaluate and equip VLMs with forensic capabilities: (1) Facial Perception, testing the ability to identify static visual artifacts; (2) Temporal Deepfake Grounding, requiring the localization of dynamic forgery artifacts across frames; and (3) Forensic Reasoning, challenging models to synthesize evidence for final authenticity verdicts. We evaluate a range of VLMs on FAQ and generate a corresponding instruction-tuning set, FAQ-IT. Extensive experiments show that models fine-tuned on FAQ-IT achieve advanced performance on both in-domain and cross-dataset detection benchmarks. Ablation studies further validate the impact of our key design choices, confirming that FAQ is the driving force behind the temporal reasoning capabilities of these VLMs.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑