arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2001.06564cs.CV

媒体取证与DeepFakes:综述

Media Forensics and DeepFakes: an overview

Università Federico II di Napoli(那不勒斯费德里科二世大学)

Luisa Verdoliva

AI总结:

本文为媒体取证综述,聚焦深度伪造检测,分析视觉媒体完整性验证方法与数据驱动取证技术,指出现有工具局限与未来研究方向。

摘要:

近年来,随着技术的快速发展,生成和篡改多媒体内容的技术如今已能达到极高的真实度水平,真实媒体与合成媒体之间的界限已变得十分模糊。一方面,这为创意艺术、广告、电影制作、电子游戏等不同领域的一系列令人兴奋的应用打开了大门;另一方面,它也带来了巨大的安全威胁。网络上免费提供的软件包让任何人无需特殊技能就能创建高度逼真的虚假图像和视频。所谓的deepfakes(深度伪造)可被用于在选举期间操纵公众舆论、实施欺诈、诋毁或勒索他人,潜在的滥用方式仅受人类想象力的限制。因此,迫切需要能够检测虚假多媒体内容、避免危险虚假信息传播的自动化工具。本综述论文旨在分析视觉媒体完整性验证方法,即篡改图像和视频的检测方法,将重点放在deepfakes这一新兴现象上,并从取证分析师的视角,聚焦现代数据驱动的取证方法。该分析将有助于明确当前取证工具的局限性、最关键的问题、即将面临的挑战,并提出未来的研究方向。

英文摘要:

With the rapid progress of recent years, techniques that generate and manipulate multimedia content can now guarantee a very advanced level of realism. The boundary between real and synthetic media has become very thin. On the one hand, this opens the door to a series of exciting applications in different fields such as creative arts, advertising, film production, video games. On the other hand, it poses enormous security threats. Software packages freely available on the web allow any individual, without special skills, to create very realistic fake images and videos. So-called deepfakes can be used to manipulate public opinion during elections, commit fraud, discredit or blackmail people. Potential abuses are limited only by human imagination. Therefore, there is an urgent need for automated tools capable of detecting false multimedia content and avoiding the spread of dangerous false information. This review paper aims to present an analysis of the methods for visual media integrity verification, that is, the detection of manipulated images and videos. Special emphasis will be placed on the emerging phenomenon of deepfakes and, from the point of view of the forensic analyst, on modern data-driven forensic methods. The analysis will help to highlight the limits of current forensic tools, the most relevant issues, the upcoming challenges, and suggest future directions for research.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑